ArticlePloS one2014
A DNA methylation network interaction measure, and detection of network oncomarkers.
Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.
- Inferring gene-regulatory networks using epigenomic priors.iScience · 2026Article
- Sparse principal component analysis based on genome network for correcting cell type heterogeneity in epigenome-wide association studies.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2022Article
- Clinical epigenetics settings for cancer and cardiovascular diseases: real-life applications of network medicine at the bedside.Clinical epigenetics · 2021Review
- Parenclitic and Synolytic Networks Revisited.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Article
- The Human Body as a Super Network: Digital Methods to Analyze the Propagation of Aging.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2020Article
- Data Integration in Poplar: 'Omics Layers and Integration Strategies.Frontiers in genetics · 2019Review
- Network assessment of demethylation treatment in melanoma: Differential transcriptome-methylome and antigen profile signatures.PloS one · 2018Article
- Identification of prognostic signature in cancer based on DNA methylation interaction network.BMC medical genomics · 2017Article
- Article
- Differential analysis of biological networks.BMC bioinformatics · 2015Article
- Crosstalk analysis of pathways in breast cancer using a network model based on overlapping differentially expressed genes.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2015Article
- Intra-Gene DNA Methylation Variability Is a Clinically Independent Prognostic Marker in Women's Cancers.PloS one · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Epigenetic processes--including DNA methylation--are increasingly seen as having a fundamental role in chronic diseases like cancer. DNA methylation patterns offer a route to develop prognostic measures based directly on DNA measurements, rather than less-stable RNA measurements. A novel DNA methylation-based measure of the co-ordinated interactive behaviour of genes is developed, in a network context. It is shown that this measure reflects well the co-regulatory behaviour linked to gene expression (at the mRNA level) over the same network interactions. This measure, defined for pairs of genes in a single patient/sample, associates with overall survival outcome independent of known prognostic clinical features, in several independent data sets relating to different cancer types. In total, more than half a billion CpGs in over 1600 samples, taken from nine different cancer entities, are analysed. It is found that groups of gene-pair interactions which associate significantly with survival identify statistically significant subnetwork modules. Many of these subnetwork modules are shown to be biologically relevant by strong correlation with pre-defined gene sets, such as immune function, wound healing, mitochondrial function and MAP-kinase signalling. In particular, the wound healing module corresponds to an increase in co-ordinated interactive behaviour between genes for worse prognosis, and the immune module corresponds to a decrease in co-ordinated interactive behaviour between genes for worse prognosis. This measure has great potential for defining DNA-based cancer biomarkers. Such biomarkers could naturally be developed further, by drawing on the rapidly expanding knowledge base of network science.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.