Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24400070›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Proteomic analysis of a NAP1 Clostridium difficile clinical isolate resistant to metronidazole.

Patrick M Chong, Tarah Lynch, Stuart McCorrister, Pamela Kibsey, Mark Miller, Denise Gravel, Garrett R Westmacott, Michael R Mulvey, Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program (CNISP)

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 69 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Clinical microbiology reviews · 2024
    Review
  2. Pathogens (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Antibiotic Resistances of Clostridioides difficile.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Iron Effects onAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  8. Characterization of Metronidazole-ResistantFrontiers in microbiology · 2022
    Article
  9. Antimicrobial resistance in Clostridioides difficile.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Review
  10. Mechanisms of antibiotic resistance of Clostridioides difficile.The Journal of antimicrobial chemotherapy · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. High Prevalence of Multidrug-ResistantFrontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2020
    Article
  16. Antimicrobial Resistance inMicrobiology spectrum · 2020
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Generation of Markerless Deletions in the Nosocomial PathogenApplied and environmental microbiology · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Patrick M ChongPublic Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Tarah LynchPublic Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Stuart McCorristerPublic Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Pamela KibseyVictoria General Hospital, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Mark MillerJewish General Hospital, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Denise GravelPublic Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Garrett R WestmacottPublic Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Michael R MulveyPublic Health Agency of Canada, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada.
Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program (CNISP)
Public Health Agency of Canada · CAJewish General Hospital · CAVictoria General Hospital · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundClostridium difficile is an anaerobic, Gram-positive bacterium that has been implicated as the leading cause of antibiotic-associated diarrhea. Metronidazole is currently the first-line treatment for mild to moderate C. difficile infections. Our laboratory isolated a strain of C. difficile with a stable resistance phenotype to metronidazole. A shotgun proteomics approach was used to compare differences in the proteomes of metronidazole-resistant and -susceptible isolates. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsNAP1 C. difficile strains CD26A54_R (Met-resistant), CD26A54_S (reduced- susceptibility), and VLOO13 (Met-susceptible) were grown to mid-log phase, and spiked with metronidazole at concentrations 2 doubling dilutions below the MIC. Peptides from each sample were labeled with iTRAQ and subjected to 2D-LC-MS/MS analysis. In the absence of metronidazole, higher expression was observed of some proteins in C. difficile strains CD26A54_S and CD26A54_R that may be involved with reduced susceptibility or resistance to metronidazole, including DNA repair proteins, putative nitroreductases, and the ferric uptake regulator (Fur). After treatment with metronidazole, moderate increases were seen in the expression of stress-related proteins in all strains. A moderate increase was also observed in the expression of the DNA repair protein RecA in CD26A54_R. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study provided an in-depth proteomic analysis of a stable, metronidazole-resistant C. difficile isolate. The results suggested that a multi-factorial response may be associated with high level metronidazole-resistance in C. difficile, including the possible roles of altered iron metabolism and/or DNA repair.

Indexed as

Drug Resistance, BacterialProteomeAnti-Infective AgentsBacterial ProteinsChromatography, LiquidClostridioides difficileCluster AnalysisGene Expression Regulation, BacterialHumansMetronidazoleProteomicsTandem Mass SpectrometryAnti-Infective AgentsBacterial ProteinsMetronidazoleProteome

Identifiers

PMID24400070
PMCPMC3882210
OpenAlexW2064656117

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.