Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24399964›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2013

Virk: an active learning-based system for bootstrapping knowledge base development in the neurosciences.

Kyle H Ambert, Aaron M Cohen, Gully A P C Burns, Eilis Boudreau, Kemal Sonmez

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Kyle H AmbertGraph Analytics Operation, Intel Labs Beaverton, OR, USA.
Aaron M CohenDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University Portland, OR, USA.
Gully A P C BurnsSchool of Engineering, Information Sciences Institute, University of Southern California Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Eilis BoudreauDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University Portland, OR, USA.
Kemal SonmezDepartment of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University Portland, OR, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The frequency and volume of newly-published scientific literature is quickly making manual maintenance of publicly-available databases of primary data unrealistic and costly. Although machine learning (ML) can be useful for developing automated approaches to identifying scientific publications containing relevant information for a database, developing such tools necessitates manually annotating an unrealistic number of documents. One approach to this problem, active learning (AL), builds classification models by iteratively identifying documents that provide the most information to a classifier. Although this approach has been shown to be effective for related problems, in the context of scientific databases curation, it falls short. We present Virk, an AL system that, while being trained, simultaneously learns a classification model and identifies documents having information of interest for a knowledge base. Our approach uses a support vector machine (SVM) classifier with input features derived from neuroscience-related publications from the primary literature. Using our approach, we were able to increase the size of the Neuron Registry, a knowledge base of neuron-related information, by a factor of 90%, a knowledge base of neuron-related information, in 3 months. Using standard biocuration methods, it would have taken between 1 and 2 years to make the same number of contributions to the Neuron Registry. Here, we describe the system pipeline in detail, and evaluate its performance against other approaches to sampling in AL.

Indexed as

active Learningbiocurationcommunity-curated databasemachine learningneuroinformaticstext-mining

Identifiers

PMID24399964
PMCPMC3872296

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.