Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24399874›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of nanomedicine2014

3D conductive nanocomposite scaffold for bone tissue engineering.

Aref Shahini, Mostafa Yazdimamaghani, Kenneth J Walker, Margaret A Eastman, Hamed Hatami-Marbini, Brenda J Smith, John L Ricci, Sundar V Madihally, Daryoosh Vashaee, Lobat Tayebi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of nanomedicine, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 46 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
46citing papers in PubMed
9.6field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

46 citing papers in PubMed, 186 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. PEDOT:PSS-A Key Material for Bioelectronics.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Aref ShahiniSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Helmerich Advanced Technology Research Center, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Mostafa YazdimamaghaniSchool of Chemical Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Kenneth J WalkerSchool of Chemical Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Margaret A EastmanDepartment of Chemistry, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Hamed Hatami-MarbiniSchool of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Brenda J SmithDepartment of Nutritional Sciences, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
John L RicciDepartment of Biomaterials and Biomimetics, New York University, New York, NY.
Sundar V MadihallySchool of Chemical Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Daryoosh VashaeeSchool of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Helmerich Advanced Technology Research Center, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA.
Lobat TayebiSchool of Chemical Engineering, Oklahoma State University, Stillwater, OK, USA ; School of Material Science and Engineering, Helmerich Advanced Technology Research Center, Oklahoma State University, Tulsa, OK, USA.
Oklahoma State University · USNew York University · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Bone healing can be significantly expedited by applying electrical stimuli in the injured region. Therefore, a three-dimensional (3D) ceramic conductive tissue engineering scaffold for large bone defects that can locally deliver the electrical stimuli is highly desired. In the present study, 3D conductive scaffolds were prepared by employing a biocompatible conductive polymer, ie, poly(3,4-ethylenedioxythiophene) poly(4-styrene sulfonate) (PEDOT:PSS), in the optimized nanocomposite of gelatin and bioactive glass. For in vitro analysis, adult human mesenchymal stem cells were seeded in the scaffolds. Material characterizations using hydrogen-1 nuclear magnetic resonance, in vitro degradation, as well as thermal and mechanical analysis showed that incorporation of PEDOT:PSS increased the physiochemical stability of the composite, resulting in improved mechanical properties and biodegradation resistance. The outcomes indicate that PEDOT:PSS and polypeptide chains have close interaction, most likely by forming salt bridges between arginine side chains and sulfonate groups. The morphology of the scaffolds and cultured human mesenchymal stem cells were observed and analyzed via scanning electron microscope, micro-computed tomography, and confocal fluorescent microscope. Increasing the concentration of the conductive polymer in the scaffold enhanced the cell viability, indicating the improved microstructure of the scaffolds or boosted electrical signaling among cells. These results show that these conductive scaffolds are not only structurally more favorable for bone tissue engineering, but also can be a step forward in combining the tissue engineering techniques with the method of enhancing the bone healing by electrical stimuli.

Indexed as

Tissue ScaffoldsBone DevelopmentCell ProliferationCells, CulturedCombined Modality TherapyElectric ConductivityElectric Stimulation TherapyElectromagnetic FieldsEquipment DesignEquipment Failure AnalysisHumansMesenchymal Stem CellsTissue Engineeringbioactive glass nanoparticlesbone scaffoldconductive polymersconductive scaffoldgelatinPEDOT:PSS

Identifiers

PMID24399874
PMCPMC3875523
OpenAlexW2084809310

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.