ArticleDer Internist2014
[Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging: importance in coronary artery disease].
Article in Der Internist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has the ability to assess the morphology, function, perfusion and evidence of myocardial scar tissue in a single examination. Moreover, cardiovascular MRI can be carried out with no exposure to radiation. Stress MRI can be performed by assessment of dobutamine-induced wall motion abnormalities or by first-pass adenosine perfusion imaging. Compared to stress echocardiography or single photon emission computed tomography, stress MRI is at least as accurate; however, patients with ferromagnetic materials or other contraindications for MRI, such as intolerance of gadolinium contrast agents cannot be examined. The quality of stress MRI depends on where the examination is being performed and should always be regarded in context to other clinical information, such as from patient history and electrocardiography.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24399474What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.