Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24398977›Full record

ArticleRNA (New York, N.Y.)2014

Aminoglycoside resistance 16S rRNA methyltransferases block endogenous methylation, affect translation efficiency and fitness of the host.

Virginia S Lioy, Sylvie Goussard, Vincent Guerineau, Eun-Jeong Yoon, Patrice Courvalin, Marc Galimand, Catherine Grillot-Courvalin

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in RNA (New York, N.Y.), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed
0.9field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 50 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Compendium of RNA modifications for bacterial stress adaptation.Microbiology and molecular biology reviews : MMBR · 2026
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. The newly identifiedAntimicrobial agents and chemotherapy · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. 30S subunit recognition and G1405 modification by the aminoglycoside-resistance 16S ribosomal RNA methyltransferase RmtC.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2023
    Article
  12. A panel of diverseMicrobial genomics · 2023
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Ribosome-targeting antibiotics and resistanceRSC medicinal chemistry · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Interactions between host epithelial cells andEmerging microbes & infections · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Molecular survey of aminoglycoside-resistantNew microbes and new infections · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Virginia S Lioy
Sylvie Goussard
Vincent Guerineau
Eun-Jeong Yoon
Patrice Courvalin
Marc Galimand
Catherine Grillot-Courvalin
Institut Pasteur · FRCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In Gram-negative bacteria, acquired 16S rRNA methyltransferases ArmA and NpmA confer high-level resistance to all clinically useful aminoglycosides by modifying, respectively, G1405 and A1408 in the A-site. These enzymes must coexist with several endogenous methyltransferases that are essential for fine-tuning of the decoding center, such as RsmH and RsmI in Escherichia coli, which methylate C1402 and RsmF C1407. The resistance methyltransferases have a contrasting distribution--ArmA has spread worldwide, whereas a single clinical isolate producing NpmA has been reported. The rate of dissemination of resistance depends on the fitness cost associated with its expression. We have compared ArmA and NpmA in isogenic Escherichia coli harboring the corresponding structural genes and their inactive point mutants cloned under the control of their native constitutive promoter in the stable plasmid pGB2. Growth rate determination and competition experiments showed that ArmA had a fitness cost due to methylation of G1405, whereas NpmA conferred only a slight disadvantage to the host due to production of the enzyme. MALDI MS indicated that ArmA impeded one of the methylations at C1402 by RsmI, and not at C1407 as previously proposed, whereas NpmA blocked the activity of RsmF at C1407. A dual luciferase assay showed that methylation at G1405 and A1408 and lack of methylation at C1407 affect translation accuracy. These results indicate that resistance methyltransferases impair endogenous methylation with different consequences on cell fitness.

Indexed as

Genetic FitnessAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsDrug Resistance, BacterialEscherichia coliEscherichia coli ProteinsMethylationMethyltransferasesModels, MolecularNucleic Acid ConformationProtein BindingProtein BiosynthesisReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA, MessengerRNA, Ribosomal, 16SAminoglycosidesAnti-Bacterial AgentsEscherichia coli ProteinsMethyltransferasesRNA, MessengerRNA, Ribosomal, 16S16S rRNA methyltransferaseaminoglycoside resistancefitnesstranslation

Identifiers

PMID24398977
PMCPMC3923132
OpenAlexW2048355391

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.