Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24398911›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of environmental research and public health2014

Temporal and spatial melanoma trends in Austria: an ecological study.

Daniela Haluza, Stana Simic, Hanns Moshammer

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of environmental research and public health, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.6field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. COVID-19: Regional Differences in Austria.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. UV-Radiation: From Physics to Impacts.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017
    Article
  10. Is UV an etiological factor of acral melanoma?Journal of exposure science & environmental epidemiology · 2016
    Review
  11. UV "Indices"-What Do They Indicate?International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Review
  12. Protection from Ultraviolet Radiation during Childhood: The Parental Perspective in Bavaria.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2016
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. [Researcher of the month].Wiener klinische Wochenschrift · 2015
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Daniela HaluzaCenter for Public Health, Institute of Environmental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, Vienna A-1090, Austria. daniela.haluza@meduniwien.ac.at.
Stana SimicCenter for Public Health, Institute of Environmental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, Vienna A-1090, Austria. stana.simic@boku.ac.at.
Hanns MoshammerCenter for Public Health, Institute of Environmental Health, Medical University of Vienna, Kinderspitalgasse 15, Vienna A-1090, Austria. hanns.moshammer@meduniwien.ac.at.
Medical University of Vienna · AT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Annual solar ultraviolet radiation (UVR) is mostly determined by latitude and altitude. Over the last decades, increasing UVR ground levels have been observed. Exposure to UVR is associated with a life-time risk to develop melanoma, a malign skin cancer. Thus, we hypothesized that melanoma incidence in Austria is associated with altitude of place of living and time of diagnosis. We investigated this hypothesis in an ecological study by district and year for Austrian melanoma incidence (1990-2010) and mortality (1970-2011) data. As expected, incidence rates increased with altitude (about 2% per 10 m) and year (about 2%). Additionally, melanoma incidence rates were about 50% higher in urban than in rural districts. In contrast, mortality rates decreased with altitude (for males: 0.4% per 10 m, for women: 0.7% per 10 m, respectively). The observed discrepancy between incidence and mortality data could partly be explained by melanoma diagnosis at earlier tumor stage in districts with higher altitude. Possible reasons for this finding include higher awareness of patients, better diagnostic performance of medical professionals working at higher altitudes, or slower tumor growth due to protective effects of sun light-associated vitamin D synthesis.

Indexed as

AltitudeAdultAgedAustriaFemaleHumansIncidenceMaleMelanomaMiddle AgedSkin NeoplasmsYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24398911
PMCPMC3924471
OpenAlexW2035663045

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.