Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24398884›Full record

ArticleHeredity2014

Male eyespan size is associated with meiotic drive in wild stalk-eyed flies (Teleopsis dalmanni).

A J Cotton, M Földvári, S Cotton, A Pomiankowski

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Heredity, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed
10.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 51 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The metabolic costs of meiotic drive.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Sexual selection can partly explain low frequencies ofProceedings. Biological sciences · 2021
    Article
  9. Resistance to natural and synthetic gene drive systems.Journal of evolutionary biology · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Hybridization, sex-specific genomic architecture and local adaptation.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2018
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

A J Cotton1] Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK [2] CoMPLEX, University College London, London, UK.
M Földvári1] Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK [2] MTA-DE 'Lendület' Behavioural Ecology Research Group, Department of Evolutionary Zoology, University of Debrecen, 1, Egyetem tér, Debrecen, Hungary.
S CottonDepartment of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK.
A Pomiankowski1] Department of Genetics, Evolution and Environment, University College London, London, UK [2] CoMPLEX, University College London, London, UK.
University College London · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This study provides the first direct evidence from wild populations of stalk-eyed flies to support the hypothesis that male eyespan is a signal of meiotic drive. Several stalk-eyed fly species are known to exhibit X-linked meiotic drive. A recent quantitative trait locus analysis in Teleopsis dalmanni found a potential link between variation in male eyespan, a sexually selected ornamental trait, and the presence of meiotic drive. This was based on laboratory populations subject to artificial selection for male eyespan. In this study, we examined the association between microsatellite markers and levels of sex ratio bias (meiotic drive) in 12 wild T. dalmanni populations. We collected two data sets: (a) brood sex ratios of wild-caught males mated to standard laboratory females and (b) variation in a range of phenotypic traits associated with reproductive success of wild-caught males and females. In each case, we typed individuals for eight X-linked microsatellite markers, including several that previously were shown to be associated with male eyespan and meiotic drive. We found that one microsatellite marker was very strongly associated with meiotic drive, whereas a second showed a weaker association. We also found that, using both independent data sets, meiotic drive was strongly associated with male eyespan, with smaller eyespan males being associated with more female-biased broods. These results suggest that mate preference for exaggerated male eyespan allows females to avoid mating with males carrying the meiotic drive gene and is thus a potential mechanism for the maintenance and evolution of female mate preference.

Indexed as

MeiosisAnimalsDipteraEyeFemaleGenotypeMaleMicrosatellite RepeatsOrgan SizeSexual Behavior, AnimalY Chromosome

Identifiers

PMID24398884
PMCPMC3966131
OpenAlexW2020992520

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.