Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24398824›Full record

Trial reportPsychopharmacology2014

Quetiapine extended-release (Seroquel-XR) versus amitriptyline monotherapy for treating patients with fibromyalgia: a 16-week, randomized, flexible-dose, open-label trial.

Elena P Calandre, Fernando Rico-Villademoros, Jaime Galán, Rocio Molina-Barea, Juan S Vilchez, Carmen M Rodriguez-Lopez, Javier Hidalgo-Tallon, Piedad Morillas-Arques

Abstract readComparative StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Psychopharmacology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 4 pooled it
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 46 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Antipsychotics for fibromyalgia in adults.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2016
    Pooled it
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Fibromyalgia interventions, obstacles and prospects: narrative review.Acta myologica : myopathies and cardiomyopathies : official journal of the Mediterranean Society of Myology · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Review of Fibromyalgia (FM) Syndrome Treatments.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022
    Review
  10. Efficacy and Safety Considerations With Second-Generation Antipsychotics as Adjunctive Analgesics: A Review of Literature.The Journal of pharmacy technology : jPT : official publication of the Association of Pharmacy Technicians · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Elena P CalandreInstituto de Neurociencias, Universidad de Granada, Avenida de Madrid 11, Granada, Spain, calandre@gmail.com.
Fernando Rico-Villademoros
Jaime Galán
Rocio Molina-Barea
Juan S Vilchez
Carmen M Rodriguez-Lopez
Javier Hidalgo-Tallon
Piedad Morillas-Arques
Universidad de Granada · ESHospital Quirónsalud Barcelona · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

rationalePrevious open-label studies have suggested that quetiapine could be a valuable alternative for treating fibromyalgia.

objectiveThis study aims to compare the efficacy and tolerability of extended-release quetiapine with amitriptyline for treating fibromyalgia.

methodsThis study was a randomized, open-label, flexible-dose, non-inferiority trial. Patients with fibromyalgia were randomized to receive quetiapine extended-release (XR) (N = 45) (50 to 300 mg daily) or amitriptyline (N = 45) (10 to 75 mg daily) for 16 weeks. The primary endpoint was the change from baseline to endpoint in the Fibromyalgia Impact Questionnaire (FIQ) total score; the non-inferiority threshold was established at 8 points. The secondary outcomes included sleep quality, anxiety, depression, and quality of life.

resultsTwenty-two (49%) patients in the quetiapine group and 34 (76%) patients in the amitriptyline group completed the study. We found a reduction of 9.8 points in the total FIQ score at the endpoint for the quetiapine-treated patients compared to 13.9 points for the amitriptyline-treated patients, for a difference of 4.14 points (80% confidence interval (CI) -0.70 to 8.98). No significant differences were found between the quetiapine XR and amitriptyline groups for any of the secondary outcomes. The proportion of patients discontinuing treatment due to adverse events was higher in the quetiapine group (n = 14, 31.1%) than the amitriptyline group (n = 3, 6.6%).

conclusionsOur results appear to indicate that quetiapine XR does not provide similar efficacy to amitriptyline for treating patients with fibromyalgia. Quetiapine XR had a worse tolerability than amitriptyline in this population, possibly due to a relatively high starting dose.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAmitriptylineAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicAnxietyDelayed-Action PreparationsDepressionDibenzothiazepinesFibromyalgiaHumansMiddle AgedPsychotropic DrugsQuality of LifeQuetiapine FumarateSleepAmitriptylineAntidepressive Agents, TricyclicDelayed-Action PreparationsDibenzothiazepinesPsychotropic DrugsQuetiapine Fumarate

Identifiers

PMID24398824
OpenAlexW1996226642

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.