Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24398258›Full record

ArticleGenome biology2014

dCLIP: a computational approach for comparative CLIP-seq analyses.

Tao Wang, Yang Xie, Guanghua Xiao

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. RNA (New York, N.Y.) · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Techniques for Characterizing Cytomegalovirus-Encoded miRNAs.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. RBinds: A user-friendly server for RNA binding site prediction.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2020
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Tao Wang
Yang Xie
Guanghua Xiao

Funding

Integrative Analysis to Identify Therapeutic Targets for Lung CancerR01CA172211 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI XIAO, GUANGHUA · 2013 to 2017
$1.6M
Predicting Adjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Lung CancerR01CA152301 · NCI · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI XIE, YANG · 2010 to 2014
$1.5M
Secondary Data Analyses for Substance Abuse ResearchR33DA027592 · NIDA · UT SOUTHWESTERN MEDICAL CENTER · PI XIAO, GUANGHUA · 2011 to 2012
$622k
NCI NIH HHS 1R01CA172211NCI NIH HHS 5R01CA152301NCI NIH HHS R01 CA172211NIDA NIH HHS 4R33DA027592NIDA NIH HHS R33 DA027592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Although comparison of RNA-protein interaction profiles across different conditions has become increasingly important to understanding the function of RNA-binding proteins (RBPs), few computational approaches have been developed for quantitative comparison of CLIP-seq datasets. Here, we present an easy-to-use command line tool, dCLIP, for quantitative CLIP-seq comparative analysis. The two-stage method implemented in dCLIP, including a modified MA normalization method and a hidden Markov model, is shown to be able to effectively identify differential binding regions of RBPs in four CLIP-seq datasets, generated by HITS-CLIP, iCLIP and PAR-CLIP protocols. dCLIP is freely available at http://qbrc.swmed.edu/software/.

Indexed as

AnimalsComputational BiologyHEK293 CellsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansImmunoprecipitationLinear ModelsMiceMicroRNAsModels, TheoreticalRNA-Binding ProteinsSequence Analysis, RNASoftwareMicroRNAsMIRN124 microRNA, humanMirn155 microRNA, mouseRNA-Binding Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24398258
PMCPMC4054096

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.