Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24398145›Full record

ArticleBreast cancer research : BCR2014

New insights into lineage restriction of mammary gland epithelium using parity-identified mammary epithelial cells.

Ted H-T Chang, Kamini Kunasegaran, Gerard A Tarulli, Duvini De Silva, P Mathijs Voorhoeve, Alexandra M Pietersen

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Breast cancer research : BCR, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed
4.3field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. The molecular chronology of mammary epithelial cell fate switching.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Lineage Tracing Methods to Study Mammary Epithelial Hierarchies In Vivo.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  11. Mammary gland development from a single cell 'omics view.Seminars in cell & developmental biology · 2021
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Ted H-T Chang
Kamini Kunasegaran
Gerard A Tarulli
Duvini De Silva
P Mathijs Voorhoeve
Alexandra M Pietersen
Duke-NUS Medical School · SGNational Cancer Centre Singapore · SG

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionParity-identified mammary epithelial cells (PI-MECs) are an interesting cellular subset because they survive involution and are a presumptive target for transformation by human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)/neu in mammary tumors. Depending on the type of assay, PI-MECs have been designated lobule-restricted progenitors or multipotent stem/progenitor cells. PI-MECs were reported to be part of the basal population of mammary epithelium based on flow cytometry. We investigated the cellular identity and lineage potential of PI-MECs in intact mammary glands.

methodsWe performed a quantitative and qualitative analysis of the contribution of PI-MECs to mammary epithelial cell lineages in pregnant and involuted mammary glands by immunohistochemistry, fluorescence-activated cells sorting (FACS), and quantitative polymerase chain reaction. PI-MECs were labeled by the activation of Whey Acidic Protein (WAP)-Cre during pregnancy that results in permanent expression of yellow fluorescent protein.

resultsAfter involution, PI-MECs are present exclusively in the luminal layer of mammary ducts. During pregnancy, PI-MECs contribute to the luminal layer but not the basal layer of alveolar lobules. Strikingly, whereas all luminal estrogen receptor (ER)-negative cells in an alveolus can be derived from PI-MECs, the alveolar ER-positive cells are unlabeled and reminiscent of Notch2-traced L cells. Notably, we observed a significant population of unlabeled alveolar progenitors that resemble PI-MECs based on transcriptional and histological analysis.

conclusionsOur demonstration that PI-MECs are luminal cells underscores that not only basal cells display multi-lineage potential in transplantation assays. However, the lineage potential of PI-MECs in unperturbed mammary glands is remarkably restricted to luminal ER-negative cells of the secretory alveolar lineage. The identification of an unlabeled but functionally similar population of luminal alveolar progenitor cells raises the question of whether PI-MECs are a unique population or the result of stochastic labeling. Interestingly, even when all luminal ER-negative cells of an alveolus are PI-MEC-derived, the basal cells and hormone-sensing cells are derived from a different source, indicating that cooperative outgrowth of cells from different lineages is common in alveologenesis.

Indexed as

Cell LineageAnimalsBacterial ProteinsCaseinsCD24 AntigenCell DifferentiationDNA-Binding ProteinsEpithelial CellsFemaleFlow CytometryIntegrin alpha6Luminescent ProteinsMammary Glands, AnimalMiceMice, TransgenicMilk ProteinsBacterial ProteinsCaseinsCD24 AntigenCd24a protein, mouseDNA-Binding ProteinsElf5 protein, mouseIntegrin alpha6Luminescent ProteinsMilk ProteinsReceptors, EstrogenTranscription Factorswhey acidic proteinsyellow fluorescent protein, Bacteria

Identifiers

PMID24398145
PMCPMC3978646
OpenAlexW2016100984

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.