Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24397985›Full record

ReviewAnimal health research reviews2014

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli in swine: the public health perspective.

Marion Tseng, Pina M Fratamico, Shannon D Manning, Julie A Funk

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Animal health research reviews, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.8field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Emergence of Transferable Plasmid Coharboring mcr-1.1 and blaTransboundary and emerging diseases · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Genomic Profiling of Multidrug-Resistant SwineAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Frontiers in microbiology · 2023
    Article
  12. EnterohemorrhagicInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Risk factors of Shiga toxin-producingEpidemiology and infection · 2022
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Gut microbial shifts by synbiotic combination ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2022
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Marion TsengCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University,East Lansing, MI 48824,USA.
Pina M FratamicoEastern Regional Research Center, Agricultural Research Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture,Wyndmoor, PA 19038,USA.
Shannon D ManningDepartment of Microbiology and Molecular Genetics,Michigan State University,East Lansing, MI 48824,USA.
Julie A FunkCollege of Veterinary Medicine, Michigan State University,East Lansing, MI 48824,USA.
Michigan State University · USAgricultural Research Service · US

Funding

The Impact of Microbiome Composition, Diversity, and Function on Enteric DiseaseU19AI090872 · NIAID · MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MANSFIELD, LINDA S. · 2010 to 2014
$7.1M
NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI090872
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains are food-borne pathogens that are an important public health concern. STEC infection is associated with severe clinical diseases in human beings, including hemorrhagic colitis (HC) and hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), which can lead to kidney failure and death. Cattle are the most important STEC reservoir. However, a number of STEC outbreaks and HUS cases have been attributed to pork products. In swine, STEC strains are known to be associated with edema disease. Nevertheless, the relationship between STEC of swine origin and human illness has yet to be determined. This review critically summarizes epidemiologic and biological studies of swine STEC. Several epidemiologic studies conducted in multiple regions of the world have demonstrated that domestic swine can carry and shed STEC. Moreover, animal studies have demonstrated that swine are susceptible to STEC O157:H7 infection and can shed the bacterium for 2 months. A limited number of molecular epidemiologic studies, however, have provided conflicting evidence regarding the relationship between swine STEC and human illness. The role that swine play in STEC transmission to people and the contribution to human disease frequency requires further evaluation.

Indexed as

AnimalsDisease OutbreaksEscherichia coli InfectionsFoodborne DiseasesHumansMeatPrevalencePublic HealthShiga-Toxigenic Escherichia coliSwineSwine Diseases

Identifiers

PMID24397985
PMCPMC4121380
OpenAlexW2335125950

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.