Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24397964›Full record

ReviewBrain research bulletin2014

Enhance, delete, incept: manipulating hippocampus-dependent memories.

Hugo J Spiers, Daniel Bendor

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Brain research bulletin, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Oscillatory Reinstatement Enhances Declarative Memory.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2017
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Sleep enhances a spatially mediated generalization of learned values.Learning & memory (Cold Spring Harbor, N.Y.) · 2015
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Hugo J SpiersInstitute of Behavioural Neuroscience, Research Department of Cognitive, Perceptual and Brain Sciences, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, UK. Electronic address: h.spiers@ucl.ac.uk.
Daniel BendorInstitute of Behavioural Neuroscience, Research Department of Cognitive, Perceptual and Brain Sciences, Division of Psychology and Language Sciences, University College London, 26 Bedford Way, London WC1H 0AP, UK. Electronic address: d.bendor@ucl.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome TrustWellcome Trust 094850/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Here we provide a brief overview of recent research on memory manipulation. We focus primarily on memories for which the hippocampus is thought to be required due to its central importance in the study of memory. The repertoire of methods employed is expanding and includes optogenetics, transcranial stimulation, deep brain stimulation, cued reactivation during sleep and the use of pharmacological agents. In addition, the possible mechanisms underlying these memory changes have been investigated using techniques such as single unit recording and functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI). This article is part of a Special Issue entitled 'Memory enhancement'.

Indexed as

AnimalsDeep Brain StimulationExtinction, PsychologicalHippocampusHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMemoryOptogeneticsSleepTranscranial Direct Current StimulationExtinctionFear conditioningHippocampusMemory consolidationReconsolidationSleep

Identifiers

PMID24397964
PMCPMC4058530

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.