Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24397572›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurotrauma2014

Old dog, new tricks: the attentional set-shifting test as a novel cognitive behavioral task after controlled cortical impact injury.

Corina O Bondi, Jeffrey P Cheng, Heather M Tennant, Christina M Monaco, Anthony E Kline

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurotrauma, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 49 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
49citing papers in PubMed
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

49 citing papers in PubMed, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Increasing Rigor of Preclinical Research to Maximize Opportunities for Translation.Neurotherapeutics : the journal of the American Society for Experimental NeuroTherapeutics · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Selective Inhibitory Circuit Dysfunction after Chronic Frontal Lobe Contusion.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2022
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Corina O Bondi1 Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
Jeffrey P Cheng
Heather M Tennant
Christina M Monaco
Anthony E Kline
University of Pittsburgh · US

Funding

Environmental Enrichment and Cholinergic Mechanisms after TBIR01NS060005 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
Understanding the Impact of Antipsychotic Drugs on Recovery After TBIR01HD069620 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH AT PITTSBURGH · PI KLINE, ANTHONY E. · 2012 to 2016
$1.6M
NICHD NIH HHS HD069620NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD069620NINDS NIH HHS NS060005
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cognitive impairment associated with prefrontal cortical dysfunction is a major component of disability in traumatic brain injury (TBI) survivors. Specifically, deficits of cognitive flexibility and attentional set-shifting are present across all levels of injury severity. Though alterations in spatial learning have been extensively described in experimental models of TBI, studies investigating more complex cognitive deficits are relatively scarce. Hence, the aim of this preclinical study was to expand on this important issue by evaluating the effect of three injury levels on executive function and behavioral flexibility performance as assessed using an attentional set-shifting test (AST). Isoflurane-anesthetized male rats received a controlled cortical impact (CCI) injury (2.6, 2.8, and 3.0 mm cortical depth at 4 m/sec) or sham injury, whereas an additional group had no surgical manipulation (naïve). Four weeks postsurgery, rats were tested on the AST, which involved a series of discriminative tasks of increasing difficulty, such as simple and compound discriminations, stimulus reversals, and intra- and extradimensional (ED) shifts. TBI produced accompanying impact depth-dependent increases in cortical lesion volumes, with the 3.0-mm cortical depth group displaying significantly larger injury volumes than the 2.6-mm group (p=0.05). Further, injury severity-induced deficits in ED set-shifting and stimulus reversals, as well as increases in total response error rates and total set loss errors, were observed. These novel findings demonstrate executive function and behavioral flexibility deficits in our animal model of CCI injury and provide the impetus to integrate the AST in the standard neurotrauma behavioral battery to further evaluate cognitive dysfunction after TBI. Ongoing experiments in our laboratory are assessing AST performance after pharmacological and rehabilitative therapies post-TBI, as well as elucidating possible mechanisms underlying the observed neuropsychological deficits.

Indexed as

AttentionDisease Models, AnimalExecutive FunctionNeuropsychological TestsAnimalsBrain InjuriesMaleRatsRats, Sprague-Dawley

Identifiers

PMID24397572
PMCPMC4012626
OpenAlexW2063142082

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.