Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24396502›Full record

ArticleTheranostics2013

Using C-arm x-ray imaging to guide local reporter probe delivery for tracking stem cell engraftment.

Dorota A Kedziorek, Meiyappan Solaiyappan, Piotr Walczak, Tina Ehtiati, Yingli Fu, Jeff W M Bulte, Steven M Shea, Alexander Brost, Frank K Wacker, Dara L Kraitchman

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theranostics, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 20% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Molecular imaging of stem cell therapies in ischemic stroke.European journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging · 2025
    Review
  2. Quantitative CT andMagma (New York, N.Y.) · 2019
    Article
  3. Article
  4. New imaging probes to track cell fate: reporter genes in stem cell research.Cellular and molecular life sciences : CMLS · 2017
    Review
  5. Noninvasive Tracking of Alginate-Microencapsulated Cells.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2017
    Article
  6. Review
  7. Emerging Imaging Modalities in Regenerative Medicine.Current pathobiology reports · 2015
    Review
  8. Pre- and postmortem imaging of transplanted cells.International journal of nanomedicine · 2015
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Dorota A Kedziorek1. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Meiyappan Solaiyappan1. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Piotr Walczak1. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States. ; 2. Cellular Imaging Section and Vascular Biology Program, Institute for Cell Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Tina Ehtiati3. Center for Applied Medical Imaging, Corporate Technology, Siemens Corporation, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Yingli Fu1. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Jeff W M Bulte1. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States. ; 2. Cellular Imaging Section and Vascular Biology Program, Institute for Cell Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Steven M Shea1. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States. ; 3. Center for Applied Medical Imaging, Corporate Technology, Siemens Corporation, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Alexander Brost4. Pattern Recognition Lab, University of Erlangen, Erlangen, Germany.
Frank K Wacker1. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States. ; 5. Department of Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Dara L Kraitchman1. Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Division of MR Research, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland, United States.
Johns Hopkins University · USFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DESiemens (Germany) · DE

Funding

X-ray & MR-visible Microencapsulation of Allogeneic Arteriogenic Cell TherapeuticR21HL089029 · NHLBI · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI KRAITCHMAN, DARA L · 2007 to 2008
$814k
NHLBI NIH HHS NIH R21-HL89029NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL089029
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Poor cell survival and difficulties with visualization of cell delivery are major problems with current cell transplantation methods. To protect cells from early destruction, microencapsulation methods have been developed. The addition of a contrast agent to the microcapsule also could enable tracking by MR, ultrasound, and X-ray imaging. However, determining the cell viability within the microcapsule still remains an issue. Reporter gene imaging provides a way to determine cell viability, but delivery of the reporter probe by systemic injection may be hindered in ischemic diseases. In the present study, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) were transfected with triple fusion reporter gene containing red fluorescent protein, truncated thymidine kinase (SPECT/PET reporter) and firefly luciferase (bioluminescence reporter). Transfected cells were microencapsulated in either unlabeled or perfluorooctylbromide (PFOB) impregnated alginate. The addition of PFOB provided radiopacity to enable visualization of the microcapsules by X-ray imaging. Before intramuscular transplantation in rabbit thigh muscle, the microcapsules were incubated with D-luciferin, and bioluminescence imaging (BLI) was performed immediately. Twenty-four and forty-eight hours post transplantation, c-arm CT was used to target the luciferin to the X-ray-visible microcapsules for BLI cell viability assessment, rather than systemic reporter probe injections. Not only was the bioluminescent signal emission from the PFOB-encapsulated MSCs confirmed as compared to non-encapsulated, naked MSCs, but over 90% of injection sites of PFOB-encapsulated MSCs were visible on c-arm CT. The latter aided in successful targeting of the reporter probe to injection sites using conventional X-ray imaging to determine cell viability at 1-2 days post transplantation. Blind luciferin injections to the approximate location of unlabeled microcapsules resulted in successful BLI signal detection in only 18% of injections. In conclusion, reporter gene probes can be more precisely targeted using c-arm CT for in vivo transplant viability assessment, thereby avoiding large and costly systemic injections of a reporter probe.

Indexed as

Luminescent MeasurementsAnimalsGenes, ReporterLuciferases, FireflyLuminescent ProteinsMesenchymal Stem CellsMesenchymal Stem Cell TransplantationMolecular ImagingRabbitsRed Fluorescent ProteinThymidine KinaseTomography, X-Ray ComputedLuciferases, FireflyLuminescent ProteinsRed Fluorescent ProteinThymidine Kinasebioluminescencec-arm CTmesenchymal stem cellsmicroencapsulationprobe targeting.reporter gene

Identifiers

PMID24396502
PMCPMC3879108
OpenAlexW2145064955

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.