Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24396050›Full record

Trial reportThe oncologist2014

An mHealth model to increase clinic attendance for breast symptoms in rural Bangladesh: can bridging the digital divide help close the cancer divide?

Ophira M Ginsburg, Mridul Chowdhury, Wei Wu, Md Touhidul Imran Chowdhury, Bidhan Chandra Pal, Rifat Hasan, Zahid H Khan, Dali Dutta, Arif Abu Saeem, Raiyan Al-Mansur and 4 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The oncologist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 45 papers, 9 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
45citing papers in PubMed, 9 pooled it
16.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

45 citing papers in PubMed, 9 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Application of patient navigation programs across the entire continuum of breast cancer care: a GRADE-assessed systematic review with meta-analysis.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Pooled it
  5. Pooled it
  6. Pooled it
  7. Pooled it
  8. Pooled it
  9. Interventions for raising breast cancer awareness in women.The Cochrane database of systematic reviews · 2017
    Pooled it
  10. Trial
  11. Trial
  12. Trial
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Ophira M GinsburgWomen's College Research Institute, Faculty of Medicine and Dalla Lana Faculty of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada; mPower Social Enterprises, Dhaka, Bangladesh; Amader Gram, Khulna, Bangladesh; International Breast Cancer Research Foundation, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.
Mridul Chowdhury
Wei Wu
Md Touhidul Imran Chowdhury
Bidhan Chandra Pal
Rifat Hasan
Zahid H Khan
Dali Dutta
Arif Abu Saeem
Raiyan Al-Mansur
Sahin Mahmud
James H Woods
Heather H Story
Reza Salim
Women's College Hospital · CAInternational Breast Cancer Research Foundation · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveTo demonstrate proof of concept for a smart phone-empowered community health worker (CHW) model of care for breast health promotion, clinical breast examination (CBE), and patient navigation in rural Bangladesh.

methodsThis study was a randomized controlled trial; July 1 to October 31, 2012, 30 CHWs conducted door-to-door interviews of women aged 25 and older in Khulna Division. Only women who disclosed a breast symptom were offered CBE. Arm A: smart phone with applications to guide interview, report data, show motivational video, and offer appointment for women with an abnormal CBE. Arm B: smart phone/applications identical to Arm A plus CHW had training in "patient navigation" to address potential barriers to seeking care. Arm C: control arm (no smart phone; same interview recorded on paper). Outcomes are presented as the "adherence" (to advice regarding a clinic appointment) for women with an abnormal CBE. This study was approved by Women's College Hospital Research Ethics Board (Toronto, Ontario, Canada) and district government officials (Khulna, Bangladesh). Funded by Grand Challenges Canada.

resultsIn 4 months, 22,337 women were interviewed; <1% declined participation, and 556 women had an abnormal CBE. Control group CHWs completed fewer interviews, had inferior data quality, and identified significantly fewer women with abnormal breast exams compared with CHWs in arms A and B. Arm B had the highest adherence.

conclusionCHWs guided by our smart phone applications were more efficient and effective in breast health promotion compared with the control group. CHW "navigators" were most effective in encouraging women with an abnormal breast examination to adhere to advice regarding clinic attendance.

Indexed as

Cell PhoneAdultBangladeshBreast DiseasesBreast NeoplasmsCommunity Health WorkersFemaleHealth PromotionHumansProgram EvaluationRural PopulationYoung AdultBreast cancerCommunity health workersHealth promotionPatient navigation

Identifiers

PMID24396050
PMCPMC3926788
OpenAlexW2132357234

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.