Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24395941›Full record

ArticleHealth affairs (Project Hope)2014

Survey finds few orthopedic surgeons know the costs of the devices they implant.

Kanu Okike, Robert V O'Toole, Andrew N Pollak, Julius A Bishop, Christopher M McAndrew, Samir Mehta, William W Cross, Grant E Garrigues, Mitchel B Harris, Christopher T Lebrun

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Health affairs (Project Hope), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 53 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
53citing papers in PubMed
36.0field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

53 citing papers in PubMed, 190 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Effects of Standardized Pricing for Distal Radius Implants.The archives of bone and joint surgery · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Intramedullary fixation of fibula fractures: A systematic review.Journal of clinical orthopaedics and trauma · 2021
    Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 8 institutions in 1 country.

Kanu Okike
Robert V O'Toole
Andrew N Pollak
Julius A Bishop
Christopher M McAndrew
Samir Mehta
William W Cross
Grant E Garrigues
Mitchel B Harris
Christopher T Lebrun
University of Maryland, Baltimore · USBrigham and Women's Hospital · USDuke University · USEmergency University · USHospital of the University of Pennsylvania · USKaiser Permanente Moanalua Medical Center · USMayo Clinic Health System · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

Washington University Institute of Clinical and Translational SciencesUL1TR000448 · NCATS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI EVANOFF, BRADLEY A · 2012 to 2016
$41.4M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000448
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orthopedic procedures represent a large expense to the Medicare program, and costs of implantable medical devices account for a large proportion of those procedures' costs. Physicians have been encouraged to consider cost in the selection of devices, but several factors make acquiring cost information difficult. To assess physicians' levels of knowledge about costs, we asked orthopedic attending physicians and residents at seven academic medical centers to estimate the costs of thirteen commonly used orthopedic devices between December 2012 and March 2013. The actual cost of each device was determined at each institution; estimates within 20 percent of the actual cost were considered correct. Among the 503 physicians who completed our survey, attending physicians correctly estimated the cost of the device 21 percent of the time, and residents did so 17 percent of the time. Thirty-six percent of physicians and 75 percent of residents rated their knowledge of device costs "below average" or "poor." However, more than 80 percent of all respondents indicated that cost should be "moderately," "very," or "extremely" important in the device selection process. Surgeons need increased access to information on the relative prices of devices and should be incentivized to participate in cost containment efforts.

Indexed as

Attitude of Health PersonnelAwarenessCost ControlCosts and Cost AnalysisData CollectionHumansInternship and ResidencyMedical Staff, HospitalMedicareOrthopedic ProceduresProstheses and ImplantsUnited StatesHealth Professions EducationPhysicians

Identifiers

PMID24395941
PMCPMC4389213
OpenAlexW1976042908

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.