Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24395384›Full record

ReviewJournal of labelled compounds & radiopharmaceuticals2014

Potential clinical applications of bimodal PET-MRI or SPECT-MRI agents.

Rafael T M de Rosales

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of labelled compounds & radiopharmaceuticals, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 16 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
16citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

16 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. The use of PET/MRI in radiotherapy.Insights into imaging · 2024
    Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Radiolabeled PET/MRI Nanoparticles for Tumor Imaging.Journal of clinical medicine · 2019
    Review
  7. Manganese in PET imaging: Opportunities and challenges.Journal of labelled compounds & radiopharmaceuticals · 2019
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. PET/MRI: a frontier in era of complementary hybrid imaging.European journal of hybrid imaging · 2018
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Radioactive Nanomaterials for Multimodality Imaging.Tomography (Ann Arbor, Mich.) · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Rafael T M de RosalesDepartment of Imaging Chemistry & Biology, Division of Imaging Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, King's College London, St. Thomas' Hospital, London, SE1 7EH, UK.

Funding

Department of HealthWellcome TrustWellcome Trust WT 088641/Z/09/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The introduction to the clinic of positron emission tomography-magnetic resonance imaging scanners opens up the possibility to evaluate the real potential of bimodal imaging agents. In this mini-review, the limitations in the design and applications of these materials are summarised and the unique properties that may result in real clinical applications outlined.

Indexed as

AnimalsHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMultimodal ImagingPositron-Emission TomographyTomography, Emission-Computed, Single-Photonmedical imagingmultimodal agentsPET-MRISPECT-MRISPIO

Identifiers

PMID24395384
PMCPMC4336561

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.