Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24394915›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2014

Illuminating p53 function in cancer with genetically engineered mouse models.

Patty B Garcia, Laura D Attardi

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 30 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
30citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

30 citing papers in PubMed, 59 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. HIF-1International journal of dentistry · 2021
    Article
  8. Regulating tumor suppressor genes: post-translational modifications.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2020
    Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. A mouse model of the Δ133p53 isoform: roles in cancer progression and inflammation.Mammalian genome : official journal of the International Mammalian Genome Society · 2018
    Review
  17. Review
  18. Deciphering p53 signaling in tumor suppression.Current opinion in cell biology · 2018
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Patty B GarciaDivision of Radiation and Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA.
Laura D AttardiDivision of Radiation and Cancer Biology, Department of Radiation Oncology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA; Department of Genetics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA 94305, USA. Electronic address: attardi@stanford.edu.
Stanford University · US

Funding

TUMOR BIOLOGYT32CA009151 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CLEARY, MICHAEL L · 1985 to 2014
$5.5M
Mouse Models to Dissect p53 Tumor Suppressor FunctionR01CA140875 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ATTARDI, LAURA D · 2011 to 2015
$1.7M
Elucidating p53 transcriptional networks involved in pancreatic cancer suppressioR21CA169673 · NCI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI ATTARDI, LAURA D · 2012 to 2013
$368k
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA140875NCI NIH HHS R21 CA169673NCI NIH HHS T32 CA009151NCI NIH HHS T32 CA09151
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The key role of the p53 protein in tumor suppression is highlighted by its frequent mutation in human cancers and by the completely penetrant cancer predisposition of p53 null mice. Beyond providing definitive evidence for the critical function of p53 in tumor suppression, genetically engineered mouse models have offered numerous additional insights into p53 function. p53 knock-in mice expressing tumor-derived p53 mutants have revealed that these mutants display gain-of-function activities that actively promote carcinogenesis. The generation of p53 knock-in mutants with alterations in different domains of p53 has helped further elucidate the cellular and biochemical activities of p53 that are most fundamental for tumor suppression. In addition, modulation of p53 post-translational modification (PTM) status by generating p53 knock-in mouse strains with mutations in p53 PTM sites has revealed a subtlety and complexity to p53 regulation. Analyses of mouse models perturbing upstream regulators of p53 have solidified the notion that the p53 pathway can be compromised by means other than direct p53 mutation. Finally, switchable p53 models that allow p53 reactivation in tumors have helped evaluate the potential of p53 restoration therapy for cancer treatment. Collectively, mouse models have greatly enhanced our understanding of physiological p53 function and will continue to provide new biological and clinical insights in future investigations.

Indexed as

AnimalsCell Cycle CheckpointsGenetic EngineeringGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMice, KnockoutMutation, MissenseNeoplasms, ExperimentalProtein Processing, Post-TranslationalProtein Structure, TertiaryTumor Suppressor Protein p53Tumor Suppressor Protein p53Mouse modelsp53Tumor suppression

Identifiers

PMID24394915
PMCPMC4035469
OpenAlexW1991744204

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.