Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24394602›Full record

ArticleEpigenetics2014

Improved reporting of DNA methylation data derived from studies of the human placenta.

Kirsten Hogg, E Magda Price, Wendy P Robinson

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Epigenetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. The human placental methylome.Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in medicine · 2015
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Kirsten HoggDepartment of Medical Genetics; University of British Columbia; Vancouver, BC Canada; Child & Family Research Institute; Vancouver, BC Canada.
E Magda PriceDepartment of Medical Genetics; University of British Columbia; Vancouver, BC Canada; Child & Family Research Institute; Vancouver, BC Canada; Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology; University of British Columbia; Vancouver, BC Canada.
Wendy P RobinsonDepartment of Medical Genetics; University of British Columbia; Vancouver, BC Canada; Child & Family Research Institute; Vancouver, BC Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Epigenetic variation is increasingly hypothesized as a mechanism underlying the effect of the in utero environment on long-term postnatal health; however, there is currently little clear data to support this in humans. A number of biological and technical factors provide challenges for the design of clinical epigenetic studies: from the type of cells or tissues that are available to the large range of predicted confounders that may impact findings. The human placenta, in addition to other neonatal tissues and whole blood, is commonly sampled for the study of epigenetic modifications. However there is little conformity for the most appropriate methods for study design, data analysis, and importantly, data interpretation. Here we present general recommendations for the reporting of DNA methylation in biological samples, with specific focus on the placenta. We outline key guidelines for: (1) placental sampling, (2) data analysis and presentation, and (3) interpretation of DNA methylation data. We emphasize the need to consider methodological noise, increase statistical power and to ensure appropriate adjustment for biological covariates. Finally, we highlight that epigenetic changes may be non-pathological and not necessarily translate into disease-associated changes. Improved reporting of DNA methylation data will be critical to identify epigenetic-based effects and to better understand the full phenotypic impact of these widely-reported epigenomic changes.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationResearch DesignCpG IslandsData Interpretation, StatisticalEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleHumansMalePlacentaPregnancySex FactorsSpecimen HandlinganalysisDNA methylationDOHADepigeneticsguidelinesplacenta

Identifiers

PMID24394602
PMCPMC4053451

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.