ArticleAnalytical biochemistry2014
The use of reaction timecourses to determine the level of minor contaminants in enzyme preparations.
Article in Analytical biochemistry, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Enzyme mutagenesis is a commonly used tool to investigate the structure and activity of enzymes. However, even minute contamination of a weakly active mutant enzyme by a considerably more active wild-type enzyme can partially or completely obscure the activity of the mutant enzyme. In this work, we propose a theoretical approach using reaction timecourses and initial velocity measurements to determine the actual contamination level of an undesired wild-type enzyme. To test this method, we applied it to a batch of the Q215A/R235A double mutant of orotidine 5'-monophosphate decarboxylase (OMPDC) from Saccharomyces cerevisiae that was inadvertently contaminated by the more active wild-type OMPDC from Escherichia coli. The enzyme preparation showed significant deviations from the expected kinetic behavior at contamination levels as low as 0.093mol%. We then confirmed the origin of the unexpected kinetic behavior by deliberately contaminating a sample of the mutant OMPDC from yeast that was known to be pure, with 0.015% wild-type OMPDC from E. coli and reproducing the same hybrid kinetic behavior.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.