Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24393668›Full record

ArticleAntiviral research2014

Application of a cell-based protease assay for testing inhibitors of picornavirus 3C proteases.

Lonneke van der Linden, Rachel Ulferts, Sander B Nabuurs, Yuri Kusov, Hong Liu, Shyla George, Céline Lacroix, Nesya Goris, David Lefebvre, Kjerstin H W Lanke and 4 more

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Antiviral research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
0.6field-weighted citation impact, top 29% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

14 authors at 5 institutions in 4 countries.

Lonneke van der LindenDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences & Nijmegen Institute for Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Laboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Rega Institute for Medical Research, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Rachel UlfertsDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences & Nijmegen Institute for Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Virology Division, Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
Sander B NabuursCentre for Molecular and Biomolecular Informatics, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Yuri KusovInstitute of Biochemistry, Center for Structural and Cell Biology in Medicine, and German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Hong LiuState Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China.
Shyla GeorgeInstitute of Biochemistry, Center for Structural and Cell Biology in Medicine, and German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany.
Céline LacroixLaboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Rega Institute for Medical Research, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Nesya GorisOkapi Sciences NV, Heverlee, Belgium.
David LefebvreVeterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre, Brussels, Belgium.
Kjerstin H W LankeDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences & Nijmegen Institute for Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Kris De ClercqVeterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre, Brussels, Belgium.
Rolf HilgenfeldInstitute of Biochemistry, Center for Structural and Cell Biology in Medicine, and German Centre for Infection Research (DZIF), University of Lübeck, Lübeck, Germany; State Key Laboratory of Drug Research, Shanghai Institute of Materia Medica, Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai Institutes for Biological Sciences, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai, China; Laboratory for Structural Biology of Infection and Inflammation, c/o DESY, Hamburg, Germany.
Johan NeytsLaboratory of Virology and Chemotherapy, Rega Institute for Medical Research, University of Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Frank J M van KuppeveldDepartment of Medical Microbiology, Nijmegen Centre for Molecular Life Sciences & Nijmegen Institute for Infection, Inflammation and Immunity, Radboud University Nijmegen Medical Centre, Nijmegen, The Netherlands; Virology Division, Department of Infectious Diseases and Immunology, Faculty of Veterinary Medicine, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. Electronic address: F.J.M.vanKuppeveld@uu.nl.
Radboud University Nijmegen · NLChinese Academy of Sciences · CNRega Institute for Medical Research · BEUniversity of Lübeck · DEVeterinary and Agrochemical Research Centre · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Proteolytical cleavage of the picornaviral polyprotein is essential for viral replication. Therefore, viral proteases are attractive targets for anti-viral therapy. Most assays available for testing proteolytical activity of proteases are performed in vitro, using heterologously expressed proteases and peptide substrates. To deal with the disadvantages associated with in vitro assays, we modified a cell-based protease assay for picornavirus proteases. The assay is based on the induction of expression of a firefly luciferase reporter by a chimeric transcription factor in which the viral protease and cleavage sites are inserted between the GAL4 binding domain and the VP16 activation domain. Firefly luciferase expression is dependent on cleavage of the transcription factor by the viral protease. This biosafe assay enables testing the effect of compounds on protease activity in cells while circumventing the need for infection. We designed the assay for 3C proteases (3C(pro)) of various enteroviruses as well as of viruses of several other picornavirus genera, and show that the assay is amenable for use in a high-throughput setting. Furthermore, we show that the spectrum of activity of 3C(pro) inhibitor AG7088 (rupintrivir) not only encompasses enterovirus 3C(pro) but also 3C(pro) of foot-and-mouth disease virus (FMDV), an aphthovirus. In contrary, AG7404 (compound 1), an analogue of AG7088, had no effect on FMDV 3C(pro) activity, for which we provide a structural explanation.

Indexed as

3C Viral ProteasesAnimalsAntiviral AgentsCell LineCysteine EndopeptidasesDrug Evaluation, PreclinicalGenes, ReporterHumansLuciferases, FireflyPicornaviridaeProtease InhibitorsViral Proteins3C Viral ProteasesAntiviral AgentsCysteine EndopeptidasesLuciferases, FireflyProtease InhibitorsViral Proteins3C(pro)Cell-based assayInhibitorPicornavirusProtease

Identifiers

PMID24393668
PMCPMC7113757
OpenAlexW1998617962

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.