Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24392845›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Chemical Society2014

Protein NMR structures refined with Rosetta have higher accuracy relative to corresponding X-ray crystal structures.

Binchen Mao, Roberto Tejero, David Baker, Gaetano T Montelione

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Chemical Society, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 35 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
35citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

35 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Paramagnetic NMR to study iron sulfur proteins:Journal of biomolecular NMR · 2023
    Article
  7. Core packing of well-defined X-ray and NMR structures is the same.Protein science : a publication of the Protein Society · 2022
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Conformational ensemble of the TNF-derived peptide solnatide in solution.Computational and structural biotechnology journal · 2022
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Developing a molecular dynamics force field for both folded and disordered protein states.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Binchen MaoCenter for Advanced Biotechnology and Medicine, and Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry, and Department of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology of Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, and Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, Rutgers, The State University of New Jersey , Piscataway, New Jersey 08854, United States.
Roberto Tejero
David Baker
Gaetano T Montelione
Joint Center for Structural Genomics · USUniversitat de València · ESUniversity of Washington · US

Funding

University of Georgia ProjectU54GM094597 · NIGMS · RUTGERS, THE STATE UNIV OF N.J. · PI ROST, BURKHARD · 2010 to 2014
$36.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS U54 GM094597NIGMS NIH HHS U54-GM094597
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have found that refinement of protein NMR structures using Rosetta with experimental NMR restraints yields more accurate protein NMR structures than those that have been deposited in the PDB using standard refinement protocols. Using 40 pairs of NMR and X-ray crystal structures determined by the Northeast Structural Genomics Consortium, for proteins ranging in size from 5-22 kDa, restrained Rosetta refined structures fit better to the raw experimental data, are in better agreement with their X-ray counterparts, and have better phasing power compared to conventionally determined NMR structures. For 37 proteins for which NMR ensembles were available and which had similar structures in solution and in the crystal, all of the restrained Rosetta refined NMR structures were sufficiently accurate to be used for solving the corresponding X-ray crystal structures by molecular replacement. The protocol for restrained refinement of protein NMR structures was also compared with restrained CS-Rosetta calculations. For proteins smaller than 10 kDa, restrained CS-Rosetta, starting from extended conformations, provides slightly more accurate structures, while for proteins in the size range of 10-25 kDa the less CPU intensive restrained Rosetta refinement protocols provided equally or more accurate structures. The restrained Rosetta protocols described here can improve the accuracy of protein NMR structures and should find broad and general for studies of protein structure and function.

Indexed as

Computer SimulationCrystallography, X-RayModels, MolecularNuclear Magnetic Resonance, BiomolecularProtein ConformationProteinsSoftwareProteins

Identifiers

PMID24392845
PMCPMC4129517
OpenAlexW2125408131

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.