ReviewProstate international2013
A comprehensive review of neuroanatomy of the prostate.
Review in Prostate international, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.
- Neuroscience in prostate cancer.Prostate cancer and prostatic diseases · 2026Review
- Novel nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy with endopelvic fascia preservation and long-term outcomes for a single surgeon.Scientific reports · 2024Article
- Local Staging of Prostate Cancer at MRI: What the Urologist and Radiation Oncologist Want to Know.Radiographics : a review publication of the Radiological Society of North America, Inc · 2023Article
- Neuropeptide Y and its receptors in prostate cancer: associations with cancer invasiveness and perineural spread.Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2023Article
- Surgical techniques to preserve continence after robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Frontiers in surgery · 2023Review
- Loss of the Sympathetic Signal Produces Sterile Inflammation of the Prostate.Frontiers in molecular neuroscience · 2022Article
- Real-time, functional intra-operative localization of rat cavernous nerve network using near-infrared cyanine voltage-sensitive dye imaging.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- Novel Gastrin-Releasing Peptide Receptor Targeted Near-Infrared Fluorescence Dye for Image-Guided Surgery of Prostate Cancer.Molecular imaging and biology · 2020Article
- A prediction model relating the extent of intraoperative fascia preservation to erectile dysfunction after nerve-sparing robot-assisted radical prostatectomy.Journal of robotic surgery · 2019Article
- Visualization of prostatic nerves by polarization-sensitive optical coherence tomography.Biomedical optics express · 2016Article
- Novel anatomical identification of nerve-sparing radical prostatectomy: fascial-sparing radical prostatectomy.Prostate international · 2014Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although oncologic efficacy is the primary goal of radical prostatectomy, preserving potency and continence is also important, given the indolent clinical course of most prostate cancers. In order to preserve and recover postoperative potency and continence after radical prostatectomy, a detailed understanding of the pelvic anatomy is necessary to recognize the optimal nerve-sparing plane and to minimize injury to the neurovascular bundles. Therefore, we reviewed the most recent findings from neuroanatomic studies of the prostate and adjacent tissues, some of which are contrary to the established consensus on pelvic anatomy. We also described the functional outcomes of radical prostatectomies following improved anatomical understanding and development of surgical techniques for preserving the neurovascular bundles.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.