Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24392402›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2013

Comparison effect of oral propranolol and oxytocin versus oxytocin only on induction of labour in nulliparous women (a double blind randomized trial).

Ashraf Direkvand Moghadam, Molouk Jaafarpour, Ali Khani

Erratum issued 2 registry-linked trialsAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03348683 phase2completednot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Propranolol Versus Placebo for Induction of Labor in Nulliparous Patients: a Double-blind Randomized Controlled Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorIcahn School of Medicine at Mount SinaiRan2017 to 2018Enrolled240ConditionsInduction of Labor Affected Fetus / NewbornArmsPropranolol, Placebo
NCT04741698 phase1completednot on this mapstarted 2021, after this paper: background citation

Propranolol for Prolonged Labor: A Randomized Controlled Trial (PRO-Labor Trial)

TypeinterventionalSponsorChristiana Care Health ServicesRan2021 to 2022Enrolled80ConditionsLabour, Obstructed, Labor DystociaArmsPropranolol
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Ashraf Direkvand MoghadamAcademic Staff of Midwifery, Psychosocial Injuries Research Center, Ilam University of Medical Sciences , Ilam, Iran .
Molouk JaafarpourAcademic Staff of Midwifery, Psychosocial Injuries Research Center, Ilam University of Medical Sciences , Ilam, Iran .
Ali KhaniAcademic Staff of Midwifery, Psychosocial Injuries Research Center, Ilam University of Medical Sciences , Ilam, Iran .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND

aimToday, research on new methods for preventing caesarean sections owing to labour induction, have been requested in obstetric practice, because of the increased morbidity related to caesarean section. Therefore, the aim of this study was to compare the effect of Oral Propranolol and Oxytocin versus Oxytocin only on induction of labour in nulliparous women. MATERIAL AND

methodsA double blind randomized controlled trial was performed at the Ilam Mostafa Hospital, Ilam, Iran, from March 2010 to March 2011 on 146 nulliparous pregnant women who had gestational age of 40-42 weeks of pregnancy and a Bishop score of ≤5. Participants were divided in two groups (with 73 participants in each group). In the first group (placebo plus Oxytocin group = 73), Oxytocin was used for the induction of labour. In the second group (Propranolol plus Oxytocin group = 73 cases), before the use of Oxytocin, 20 mg Propranolol was administrated orally and then the Oxytocin was initiated. Twenty mg Propranolol was repeated after 8 hours if good contraction was not obtained.

resultsThe mean duration for obtaining good contractions was significantly shorter in the Propranolol group than in the placebo group, on both the first and second day of induction (p<.05). The mean duration of latent phase was shorter in the first in Propranolol group (p<.05). In Propranolol plus Oxytocine group, frequency of cesarean deliveries significantly decreased than in the placebo plus Oxytocin group (21% versus 39.7%). No significant differences in neonate outcome, such as Apgar scores of minutes 1 and 5 and need of admissions to NICU, were found between the groups (p>.05) DISCUSSION AND

conclusionOur study showed that oral Propranolol was effective for labour induction and that it could decrease the frequency of caesarean deliveries without producing any adverse effects on mothers or neonates.

Indexed as

Caesarean deliveryInduction of labourOxytocinPropranolol

Identifiers

PMID24392402
PMCPMC3879864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.