Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24392398›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2013

Evaluation of health literacy status among patients in a tertiary care hospital in coastal karnataka, India.

Rathnakar U P, Madhuri Belman, Ashwin Kamath, Unnikrishnan B, Ashok Shenoy K, Udupa A L

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 31 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Health Literacy and Knowledge of Chronic Diseases in Nepal.Health literacy research and practice · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Development and Validation of Educational Leaflet for Caregivers of Preterm Infants.Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR · 2016
    Article
  15. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Rathnakar U PAssociate Professor, Department of Pharmacology, Kasturba Medical College , Mangalore, Manipal University, India .
Madhuri BelmanStudent, MBBS III year, Kasturba Medical College , Mangalore, Manipal University, India .
Ashwin KamathStudent, MBBS III year, Kasturba Medical College , Mangalore, Manipal University, India .
Unnikrishnan BProfessor & HOD Department of Community Medicine, Kasturba Medical College , Mangalore, Manipal University, India .
Ashok Shenoy KProfessor & HOD, Department of Pharmacology, Kasturba Medical College , Mangalore, Manipal University, India .
Udupa A LProfessor, Department of Pharmacology, FMS, UWI, Cave Hill Campus , Barbados, India .
Kasturba Medical College, Manipal · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPeople with limited health literacy are more likely to make medication errors, and they have less health knowledge, worse health status, more hospitalizations, and higher healthcare costs than people with adequate literacy. The objective of this study is to assess the health literacy status among patients who are able to read and understand English attending a tertiary care hospital by using Rapid Estimate of Adult Literacy in Medicine [REALM] technique and to compare the health literacy levels to educational status and other baseline characteristics. MATERIAL AND

methodsA widely used word recognition method [REALM] was used to assess the HL status of 200 patients attending a tertiary care hospital in Southern India. The number of correctly pronounced words was used to assign a grade-equivalent reading level. Scores 0 to 44 indicate reading skills at or below the 6th grade level, scores from 45 to 60 represent skills at the 7th or 8th grade level, and scores above 60 indicate skills at the high-school level or higher.

resultsHL status was found below adequate level in more than 50% of the patients. Younger age group showed better HL scores compared to those aged more than 25 years. General education level or the medium of education does not truly reflect HL levels as brought out in the study. Even those with postgraduate qualification had poor HL skills.

conclusionThe study was carried out to find out the HL levels among patients attending a tertiary care hospital. It was assumed that the general education levels may not reflect true HL status. In view of the results of this study it can be concluded that patient's HL skills should not be taken for granted and adequate attention should be paid in educating and briefing patients whenever patients are required to interpret and understand health care related documents.

Indexed as

educationHealth LiteracyIndiaREALM

Identifiers

PMID24392398
PMCPMC3879879
OpenAlexW2057530185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.