Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24392374›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR2013

Revised Ciprofloxacin Breakpoints for Salmonella: Is it Time to Write an Obituary?

Revathy Girish, Anil Kumar, Sadia Khan, Kavitha R Dinesh, Shamsul Karim

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical and diagnostic research : JCDR, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. A systematic review of antimicrobial resistance of typhoidalThe Indian journal of medical research · 2019
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Infectious disorders drug targets · 2024
    Review
  5. Genomic Characterization of a Nalidixic Acid-ResistantFrontiers in veterinary science · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Revathy GirishMSc, Department of Microbiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences , Ponekara, Kochi-682041, Kerala India .
Anil KumarClinical Associate Professor, Department of Microbiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences , Ponekara, Kochi-682041, Kerala India .
Sadia KhanClinical Assistant Professor, Department of Microbiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences , Ponekara, Kochi-682041, Kerala, India .
Kavitha R DineshClinical Professor, Department of Microbiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences , Ponekara, Kochi-682041, Kerala India .
Shamsul KarimProfessor & Head, Department of Microbiology, Amrita Institute of Medical Sciences , Ponekara, Kochi-682041, Kerala India .

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesTo determine the minimum inhibitory concentration of ciprofloxacin among 50 blood stream isolates of Salmonella enterica. MATERIAL AND

methodsA total of 50 consecutive isolates of Salmonella enterica were tested for susceptibility to antimicrobials using the Kirby Bauer disk diffusion method. Minimum inhibitory concentrations were determined using Hi-Comb strips. All results were interpreted according to the CLSI guidelines.

resultsOf the 50 isolates 70%were Salmonella Typhi, 4% Salmonella paratyphi A, 2% Salmonella paratyphi B and the remaining 10% were identified only as Salmonella species. Using the CLSI 2011 breakpoints for disc diffusion, 86% (43/50) were resistant to nalidixic acid(NA), 22% (11/50) to ciprofloxacin, 12% to azithromycin, 6% to cotrimoxazole, 4% to ampicillin and 1% to chloramphenicol. The MIC50 and MIC90 of ciprofloxacin for S.Typhi were 0.181 μg/mL and 5.06 μg/mL respectively. While the same for S. paratyphi A was 0.212μg/mL and 0.228μg/mL respectively. None of the isolates were multi drug resistant and all were susceptible to ceftriaxone. Using the CLSI 2012 revised ciprofloxacin breakpoints for disc diffusion (>31mm) & MIC (<0.06 μg/mL), 90% (45/50) of these isolates were found to be resistant.

conclusionMIC's of ciprofloxacin should be reported for all salmonella isolates and should be used to guide treatment. Blindly following western guidelines for a disease which is highly endemic in the subcontinent will spell the death knell of a cheap and effective drug in our armamentarium. Therefore it will be too premature to declare that "the concept of using ciprofloxacin in typhoid fever is dead!"

Indexed as

BreakpointsCiprofloxacinResistanceSalmonella paratyphi ASalmonella typhi

Identifiers

PMID24392374
PMCPMC3879876

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.