Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24392177›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2014

The Trypanosoma cruzi satellite DNA OligoC-TesT and Trypanosoma cruzi kinetoplast DNA OligoC-TesT for diagnosis of Chagas disease: a multi-cohort comparative evaluation study.

Koen De Winne, Philippe Büscher, Alejandro O Luquetti, Suelene B N Tavares, Rodrigo A Oliveira, Aldo Solari, Ines Zulantay, Werner Apt, Patricio Diosque, Mercedes Monje Rumi and 7 more

Open access · goldAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.6field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Chagas Disease: Detection ofJournal of clinical medicine · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors at 8 institutions in 6 countries.

Koen De WinneDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Parasite Diagnostics Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Philippe BüscherDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Parasite Diagnostics Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Alejandro O LuquettiInstituto de Patología Tropical e Saúde Pública and Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania, Brazil.
Suelene B N TavaresInstituto de Patología Tropical e Saúde Pública and Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania, Brazil.
Rodrigo A OliveiraInstituto de Patología Tropical e Saúde Pública and Hospital das Clínicas, Universidade Federal de Goiás, Goiania, Brazil.
Aldo SolariPrograma de Biología Celular y Molecular, ICBM, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Ines ZulantayPrograma de Biología Celular y Molecular, ICBM, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Werner AptPrograma de Biología Celular y Molecular, ICBM, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Chile, Santiago, Chile.
Patricio DiosqueUnidad de Epidemiología Molecular (UEM), Instituto de Patología Experimental, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Salta, Argentina.
Mercedes Monje RumiUnidad de Epidemiología Molecular (UEM), Instituto de Patología Experimental, Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas (CONICET), Salta, Argentina.
Nuria GironèsCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC)-Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.
Manuel FresnoCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa, Consejo Superior de Investigaciones Cientificas (CSIC)-Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Cantoblanco, Madrid, Spain.
Rogelio Lopez-VelezTropical Medicine & Clinical Parasitology, Infectious Diseases Department, Ramón y Cajal Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
José A Perez-MolinaTropical Medicine & Clinical Parasitology, Infectious Diseases Department, Ramón y Cajal Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Begoña Monge-MailloTropical Medicine & Clinical Parasitology, Infectious Diseases Department, Ramón y Cajal Hospital, Madrid, Spain.
Lineth GarciaFacultad de Medicina, Universidad Mayor de San Simón, Cochabamba, Bolivia.
Stijn DeborggraeveDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Parasite Diagnostics Unit, Institute of Tropical Medicine, Antwerp, Belgium.
Instituto Cajal · ESInstituut voor Tropische Geneeskunde · BEUniversidade Federal de Goiás · BRUniversity of Chile · CLConsejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas · ARCentro de Biología Molecular Severo Ochoa · ESConsejo Superior de Investigaciones Científicas · ESUniversity of San Simón · BO

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe Trypanosoma cruzi satellite DNA (satDNA) OligoC-TesT is a standardised PCR format for diagnosis of Chagas disease. The sensitivity of the test is lower for discrete typing unit (DTU) TcI than for TcII-VI and the test has not been evaluated in chronic Chagas disease patients. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL

findingsWe developed a new prototype of the OligoC-TesT based on kinetoplast DNA (kDNA) detection. We evaluated the satDNA and kDNA OligoC-TesTs in a multi-cohort study with 187 chronic Chagas patients and 88 healthy endemic controls recruited in Argentina, Chile and Spain and 26 diseased non-endemic controls from D.R. Congo and Sudan. All specimens were tested in duplicate. The overall specificity in the controls was 99.1% (95% CI 95.2%-99.8%) for the satDNA OligoC-TesT and 97.4% (95% CI 92.6%-99.1%) for the kDNA OligoC-TesT. The overall sensitivity in the patients was 67.9% (95% CI 60.9%-74.2%) for the satDNA OligoC-TesT and 79.1% (95% CI 72.8%-84.4%) for the kDNA OligoC-Test. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Specificities of the two T. cruzi OligoC-TesT prototypes are high on non-endemic and endemic controls. Sensitivities are moderate but significantly (p = 0.0004) higher for the kDNA OligoC-TesT compared to the satDNA OligoC-TesT.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAfricaAgedChagas DiseaseCohort StudiesDNA, KinetoplastDNA, SatelliteFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesParasitologyProspective StudiesSensitivity and SpecificityDNA, KinetoplastDNA, Satellite

Identifiers

PMID24392177
PMCPMC3879245
OpenAlexW1976819240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.