Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24392174›Full record

ArticlePLoS neglected tropical diseases2014

Accelerated detection of mycolactone production and response to antibiotic treatment in a mouse model of Mycobacterium ulcerans disease.

Paul J Converse, Yalan Xing, Ki Hyun Kim, Sandeep Tyagi, Si-Yang Li, Deepak V Almeida, Eric L Nuermberger, Jacques H Grosset, Yoshito Kishi

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS neglected tropical diseases, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
2.8field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 44 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Detection of Mycolactone by Thin Layer Chromatography.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  5. Conditions for Handling and Optimal Storage of Mycolactone.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  6. Drug Efficacy Testing in the Mouse Footpad Model of Buruli Ulcer.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Pharmacologic management ofExpert review of clinical pharmacology · 2020
    Review
  11. The Many Hosts of Mycobacteria 8 (MHM8): A conference report.Tuberculosis (Edinburgh, Scotland) · 2020
    Review
  12. In Vivo Imaging of BioluminescentThe American journal of tropical medicine and hygiene · 2019
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. The chemistry and biology of mycolactones.Beilstein journal of organic chemistry · 2017
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Clinical and Laboratory Diagnosis of Buruli Ulcer Disease: A Systematic Review.The Canadian journal of infectious diseases & medical microbiology = Journal canadien des maladies infectieuses et de la microbiologie medicale · 2016
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Paul J ConverseJohns Hopkins University Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Yalan XingDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Ki Hyun KimDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Sandeep TyagiJohns Hopkins University Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Si-Yang LiJohns Hopkins University Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Deepak V AlmeidaJohns Hopkins University Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Eric L NuermbergerJohns Hopkins University Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Jacques H GrossetJohns Hopkins University Center for Tuberculosis Research, Baltimore, Maryland, United States of America.
Yoshito KishiDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Johns Hopkins University · USHarvard University · US

Funding

Firing up new treatments against Mycobacterium ulcerans disease (Buruli ulcer)R01AI082612 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI GROSSET, JACQUES H. · 2009 to 2013
$2.0M
NIAID NIH HHS R01-AI.082612
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Diagnosis of the neglected tropical disease, Buruli ulcer, can be made by acid-fast smear microscopy, specimen culture on mycobacterial growth media, polymerase chain reaction (PCR), and/or histopathology. All have drawbacks, including non-specificity and requirements for prolonged culture at 32°C, relatively sophisticated laboratory facilities, and expertise, respectively. The causative organism, Mycobacterium ulcerans, produces a unique toxin, mycolactone A/B (ML) that can be detected by thin layer chromatography (TLC) or mass spectrometric analysis. Detection by the latter technique requires sophisticated facilities. TLC is relatively simple but can be complicated by the presence of other lipids in the specimen. A method using a boronate-assisted fluorogenic chemosensor in TLC can overcome this challenge by selectively detecting ML when visualized with UV light. This report describes modifications in the fluorescent TLC (F-TLC) procedure and its application to the mouse footpad model of M. ulcerans disease to determine the kinetics of mycolactone production and its correlation with footpad swelling and the number of colony forming units in the footpad. The response of all three parameters to treatment with the current standard regimen of rifampin (RIF) and streptomycin (STR) or a proposed oral regimen of RIF and clarithromycin (CLR) was also assessed. ML was detectable before the onset of footpad swelling when there were <10(5) CFU per footpad. Swelling occurred when there were >10(5) CFU per footpad. Mycolactone concentrations increased as swelling increased whereas CFU levels reached a plateau. Treatment with either RIF+STR or RIF+CLR resulted in comparable reductions of mycolactone, footpad swelling, and CFU burden. Storage in absolute ethanol appears critical to successful detection of ML in footpads and would be practical for storage of clinical samples. F-TLC may offer a new tool for confirmation of suspected clinical lesions and be more specific than smear microscopy, much faster than culture, and simpler than PCR.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnti-Bacterial AgentsBuruli UlcerChromatography, Thin LayerDrug MonitoringMacrolidesMiceMycobacterium ulceransAnti-Bacterial AgentsMacrolidesmycolactone

Identifiers

PMID24392174
PMCPMC3879254
OpenAlexW2102294501

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.