Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24392093›Full record

ArticlePloS one2014

Advancing a framework to enable characterization and evaluation of data streams useful for biosurveillance.

Kristen J Margevicius, Nicholas Generous, Kirsten J Taylor-McCabe, Mac Brown, W Brent Daniel, Lauren Castro, Andrea Hengartner, Alina Deshpande

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Spread of Epidemic Disease on Edge-Weighted Graphs from a Database: A Case Study of COVID-19.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2021
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Kristen J MargeviciusDefense Systems and Analysis Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Nicholas GenerousDefense Systems and Analysis Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Kirsten J Taylor-McCabeBiosciences Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Mac BrownDefense Systems and Analysis Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
W Brent DanielDefense Systems and Analysis Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Lauren CastroDefense Systems and Analysis Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Andrea HengartnerDefense Systems and Analysis Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.
Alina DeshpandeDefense Systems and Analysis Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico, United States of America.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In recent years, biosurveillance has become the buzzword under which a diverse set of ideas and activities regarding detecting and mitigating biological threats are incorporated depending on context and perspective. Increasingly, biosurveillance practice has become global and interdisciplinary, requiring information and resources across public health, One Health, and biothreat domains. Even within the scope of infectious disease surveillance, multiple systems, data sources, and tools are used with varying and often unknown effectiveness. Evaluating the impact and utility of state-of-the-art biosurveillance is, in part, confounded by the complexity of the systems and the information derived from them. We present a novel approach conceptualizing biosurveillance from the perspective of the fundamental data streams that have been or could be used for biosurveillance and to systematically structure a framework that can be universally applicable for use in evaluating and understanding a wide range of biosurveillance activities. Moreover, the Biosurveillance Data Stream Framework and associated definitions are proposed as a starting point to facilitate the development of a standardized lexicon for biosurveillance and characterization of currently used and newly emerging data streams. Criteria for building the data stream framework were developed from an examination of the literature, analysis of information on operational infectious disease biosurveillance systems, and consultation with experts in the area of biosurveillance. To demonstrate utility, the framework and definitions were used as the basis for a schema of a relational database for biosurveillance resources and in the development and use of a decision support tool for data stream evaluation.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiosurveillanceDatabases, FactualData MiningHumansInformation Storage and RetrievalOrganizationsPublic Health Surveillance

Identifiers

PMID24392093
PMCPMC3879288

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.