Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24391978›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2013

Effect of erythropoiesis-stimulating agents on blood pressure in pre-dialysis patients.

Marit M Suttorp, Tiny Hoekstra, Moshe Mittelman, Ilka Ott, Casper F M Franssen, Friedo W Dekker

Abstract readClinical Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Marit M SuttorpDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Tiny HoekstraDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Moshe MittelmanDepartment of Medicine, Tel Aviv Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv, Israel.
Ilka OttDeutsches Herzzentrum der Technischen Universität München, München, Germany.
Casper F M FranssenDepartment of Nephrology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.
Friedo W DekkerDepartment of Clinical Epidemiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionErythropoiesis-Stimulating Agents (ESA) are hypothesized to increase cardiovascular mortality in patients with chronic kidney disease. One of the proposed mechanisms is the elevation of blood pressure (BP) by ESA. Therefore, we aimed to determine whether the use of ESA was associated with antihypertensive treatment and higher BP. MATERIALS AND

methodsIn this cohort 502 incident pre-dialysis patients were included who started specialized pre-dialysis care in 25 clinics in the Netherlands. Data on medication including ESA use and dose, co-morbidities and BP were routinely collected every 6 months. Antihypertensive treatment and BP were compared for patients with and without ESA at baseline. Differences in antihypertensive medication and BP during pre-dialysis care were estimated with linear mixed models adjusted for age, sex, body mass index, cardiovascular disease, diabetes mellitus and estimated glomerular filtration rate.

resultsAt baseline, 95.6% of patients with ESA were treated with antihypertensive medication and 73.1% of patients without ESA. No relevant difference in BP was found. During pre-dialysis care patients with ESA used 0.77 (95% CI 0.63;0.91) more classes of antihypertensive drugs. The adjusted difference in systolic blood pressure (SBP) was -0.3 (95% CI -2.7;2.0) mmHg and in diastolic blood pressure (DBP) was -1.0 (95% CI -2.1;0.3) mmHg for patients with ESA compared to patients without ESA. Adjusted SBP was 3.7 (95% CI -1.6;9.0) mmHg higher in patients with a high ESA dose compared to patients with a low ESA dose.

conclusionsOur study confirms the hypertensive effect of ESA, since ESA treated patients received more antihypertensive agents. However, no relevant difference in BP was found between patients with and without ESA, thus the increase in BP seems to be controlled for by antihypertensive medication.

Indexed as

Age FactorsAntihypertensive AgentsBlood PressureBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesFollow-Up StudiesGlomerular Filtration RateHematinicsHumansHypertensionLinear ModelsNetherlandsProspective StudiesRenal Insufficiency, ChronicSex FactorsAntihypertensive AgentsHematinics

Identifiers

PMID24391978
PMCPMC3877353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.