ArticlePloS one2013
Effective identification of Gram-negative bacterial type III secreted effectors using position-specific residue conservation profiles.
Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning for the prediction of gram-negative bacterial secreted effectors: advances and challenges.Frontiers in chemistry · 2026Review
- POOE: predicting oomycete effectors based on a pre-trained large protein language model.mSystems · 2024Article
- From prediction to function: Current practices and challenges towards the functional characterization of type III effectors.Frontiers in microbiology · 2023Review
- Natural language processing approach to model the secretion signal of type III effectors.Frontiers in plant science · 2022Article
- Delivering the pain: an overview of the type III secretion system with special consideration for aquatic pathogens.Veterinary research · 2021Review
- DeepT3 2.0: improving type III secreted effector predictions by an integrative deep learning framework.NAR genomics and bioinformatics · 2021Article
- iT3SE-PX: Identification of Bacterial Type III Secreted Effectors Using PSSM Profiles and XGBoost Feature Selection.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2021Article
- DeepT3_4: A Hybrid Deep Neural Network Model for the Distinction Between Bacterial Type III and IV Secreted Effectors.Frontiers in microbiology · 2021Article
- ACNNT3: Attention-CNN Framework for Prediction of Sequence-Based Bacterial Type III Secreted Effectors.Computational and mathematical methods in medicine · 2020Article
- Bastion3: a two-layer ensemble predictor of type III secreted effectors.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Genome-wide prediction of bacterial effector candidates across six secretion system types using a feature-based statistical framework.Scientific reports · 2018Article
- SecretEPDB: a comprehensive web-based resource for secreted effector proteins of the bacterial types III, IV and VI secretion systems.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- Type III secretion systems: the bacterial flagellum and the injectisome.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2015Review
- BEAN 2.0: an integrated web resource for the identification and functional analysis of type III secreted effectors.Database : the journal of biological databases and curation · 2015Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundType III secretion systems (T3SSs) are central to the pathogenesis and specifically deliver their secreted substrates (type III secreted proteins, T3SPs) into host cells. Since T3SPs play a crucial role in pathogen-host interactions, identifying them is crucial to our understanding of the pathogenic mechanisms of T3SSs. This study reports a novel and effective method for identifying the distinctive residues which are conserved different from other SPs for T3SPs prediction. Moreover, the importance of several sequence features was evaluated and further, a promising prediction model was constructed.
resultsBased on the conservation profiles constructed by a position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM), 52 distinctive residues were identified. To our knowledge, this is the first attempt to identify the distinct residues of T3SPs. Of the 52 distinct residues, the first 30 amino acid residues are all included, which is consistent with previous studies reporting that the secretion signal generally occurs within the first 30 residue positions. However, the remaining 22 positions span residues 30-100 were also proven by our method to contain important signal information for T3SP secretion because the translocation of many effectors also depends on the chaperone-binding residues that follow the secretion signal. For further feature optimisation and compression, permutation importance analysis was conducted to select 62 optimal sequence features. A prediction model across 16 species was developed using random forest to classify T3SPs and non-T3 SPs, with high receiver operating curve of 0.93 in the 10-fold cross validation and an accuracy of 94.29% for the test set. Moreover, when performing on a common independent dataset, the results demonstrate that our method outperforms all the others published to date. Finally, the novel, experimentally confirmed T3 effectors were used to further demonstrate the model's correct application. The model and all data used in this paper are freely available at http://cic.scu.edu.cn/bioinformatics/T3SPs.zip.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.