Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24391886›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Small RNA analysis in Sindbis virus infected human HEK293 cells.

Andras Donaszi-Ivanov, Irina Mohorianu, Tamas Dalmay, Penny P Powell

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Computational Prediction of miRNA Genes from Small RNA Sequencing Data.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2015
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Drosha as an interferon-independent antiviral factor.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2014
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Andras Donaszi-IvanovNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
Irina MohorianuSchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
Tamas DalmaySchool of Biological Sciences, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
Penny P PowellNorwich Medical School, University of East Anglia, Norwich, Norfolk, United Kingdom.
University of East Anglia · GB

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/J021601/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/B/00689
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionIn contrast to the defence mechanism of RNA interference (RNAi) in plants and invertebrates, its role in the innate response to virus infection of mammals is a matter of debate. Since RNAi has a well-established role in controlling infection of the alphavirus Sindbis virus (SINV) in insects, we have used this virus to investigate the role of RNAi in SINV infection of human cells.

resultsSINV AR339 and TR339-GFP were adapted to grow in HEK293 cells. Deep sequencing of small RNAs (sRNAs) early in SINV infection (4 and 6 hpi) showed low abundance (0.8%) of viral sRNAs (vsRNAs), with no size, sequence or location specific patterns characteristic of Dicer products nor did they possess any discernible pattern to ascribe to a specific RNAi biogenesis pathway. This was supported by multiple variants for each sequence, and lack of hot spots along the viral genome sequence. The abundance of the best defined vsRNAs was below the limit of Northern blot detection. The adaptation of the virus to HEK293 cells showed little sequence changes compared to the reference; however, a SNP in E1 gene with a preference from G to C was found. Deep sequencing results showed little variation of expression of cellular microRNAs (miRNAs) at 4 and 6 hpi compared to uninfected cells. Twelve miRNAs exhibiting some minor differential expression by sequencing, showed no difference in expression by Northern blot analysis.

conclusionsWe show that, unlike SINV infection of invertebrates, generation of Dicer-dependent svRNAs and change in expression of cellular miRNAs were not detected as part of the Human response to SINV.

Indexed as

Genome, ViralAlphavirus InfectionsBiomarkersBlotting, NorthernGene Expression ProfilingHEK293 CellsHigh-Throughput Nucleotide SequencingHumansMicroRNAsReal-Time Polymerase Chain ReactionReverse Transcriptase Polymerase Chain ReactionRNA InterferenceRNA, MessengerRNA, Small InterferingRNA, ViralSindbis VirusBiomarkersMicroRNAsRNA, MessengerRNA, Small InterferingRNA, Viral

Identifiers

PMID24391886
PMCPMC3877139
OpenAlexW2034651925

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.