Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24391860›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Site-specific, insertional inactivation of incA in Chlamydia trachomatis using a group II intron.

Cayla M Johnson, Derek J Fisher

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 106 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
106citing papers in PubMed
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

106 citing papers in PubMed, 127 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. ThemBio · 2026
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Complete deletion of theInfection and immunity · 2025
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Journal of bacteriology · 2025
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. mSphere · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Article

46 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Cayla M JohnsonDepartment of Microbiology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, United States of America.
Derek J FisherDepartment of Microbiology, Southern Illinois University, Carbondale, Illinois, United States of America.
Southern Illinois University Carbondale · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chlamydia trachomatis is an obligate, intracellular bacterial pathogen that has until more recently remained recalcitrant to genetic manipulation. However, the field still remains hindered by the absence of tools to create selectable, targeted chromosomal mutations. Previous work with mobile group II introns demonstrated that they can be retargeted by altering DNA sequences within the intron's substrate recognition region to create site-specific gene insertions. This platform (marketed as TargeTron™, Sigma) has been successfully employed in a variety of bacteria. We subsequently modified TargeTron™ for use in C. trachomatis and as proof of principle used our system to insertionally inactivate incA, a chromosomal gene encoding a protein required for homotypic fusion of chlamydial inclusions. C. trachomatis incA::GII(bla) mutants were selected with ampicillin and plaque purified clones were then isolated for genotypic and phenotypic analysis. PCR, Southern blotting, and DNA sequencing verified proper GII(bla) insertion, while continuous passaging in the absence of selection demonstrated that the insertion was stable. As seen with naturally occurring IncA(-) mutants, light and immunofluorescence microscopy confirmed the presence of non-fusogenic inclusions in cells infected with the incA::GII(bla) mutants at a multiplicity of infection greater than one. Lack of IncA production by mutant clones was further confirmed by Western blotting. Ultimately, the ease of retargeting the intron, ability to select for mutants, and intron stability in the absence of selection makes this method a powerful addition to the growing chlamydial molecular toolbox.

Indexed as

AnimalsBacterial ProteinsBlotting, SouthernBlotting, WesternCells, CulturedChlamydia InfectionsChlamydia trachomatisFibroblastsInclusion BodiesIntronsMembrane ProteinsMiceMicroscopy, FluorescenceMutagenesis, InsertionalMutagenesis, Site-DirectedMutationBacterial ProteinsIncA protein, Chlamydia trachomatisMembrane Proteins

Identifiers

PMID24391860
PMCPMC3877132
OpenAlexW2094119638

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.