Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24391732›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Genome-wide methylation and gene expression changes in newborn rats following maternal protein restriction and reversal by folic acid.

Gioia Altobelli, Irina G Bogdarina, Elia Stupka, Adrian J L Clark, Simon Langley-Evans

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
14.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 65 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. How Does Protein Nutrition Affect the Epigenetic Changes in Pig? A Review.Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2021
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. When maternal periconceptional diet affects neurological development, it's time to think.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2018
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Gioia AltobelliCentre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Centre, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Irina G BogdarinaCentre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Centre, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Elia StupkaInstitute of Cell and Molecular Bioscience, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Adrian J L ClarkCentre for Endocrinology, William Harvey Research Centre, Barts and the London School of Medicine and Dentistry, Queen Mary University of London, London, United Kingdom.
Simon Langley-EvansSchool of Biosciences, University of Nottingham, Sutton Bonington, Loughborough, United Kingdom.
Queen Mary University of London · GBUniversity of Nottingham · GB

Funding

Medical Research Council G0801269
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A large body of evidence from human and animal studies demonstrates that the maternal diet during pregnancy can programme physiological and metabolic functions in the developing fetus, effectively determining susceptibility to later disease. The mechanistic basis of such programming is unclear but may involve resetting of epigenetic marks and fetal gene expression. The aim of this study was to evaluate genome-wide DNA methylation and gene expression in the livers of newborn rats exposed to maternal protein restriction. On day one postnatally, there were 618 differentially expressed genes and 1183 differentially methylated regions (FDR 5%). The functional analysis of differentially expressed genes indicated a significant effect on DNA repair/cycle/maintenance functions and of lipid, amino acid metabolism and circadian functions. Enrichment for known biological functions was found to be associated with differentially methylated regions. Moreover, these epigenetically altered regions overlapped genetic loci associated with metabolic and cardiovascular diseases. Both expression changes and DNA methylation changes were largely reversed by supplementing the protein restricted diet with folic acid. Although the epigenetic and gene expression signatures appeared to underpin largely different biological processes, the gene expression profile of DNA methyl transferases was altered, providing a potential link between the two molecular signatures. The data showed that maternal protein restriction is associated with widespread differential gene expression and DNA methylation across the genome, and that folic acid is able to reset both molecular signatures.

Indexed as

DNA MethylationMaternal Nutritional Physiological PhenomenaAnimalsAnimals, NewbornDiet, Protein-RestrictedEpigenesis, GeneticFemaleFolic AcidGene ExpressionGenomeGenome-Wide Association StudyHumansMalePregnancyPrenatal Exposure Delayed EffectsRatsFolic Acid

Identifiers

PMID24391732
PMCPMC3877003
OpenAlexW1970703179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.