Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24391728›Full record

ArticlePloS one2013

Anticancer properties of distinct antimalarial drug classes.

Rob Hooft van Huijsduijnen, R Kiplin Guy, Kelly Chibale, Richard K Haynes, Ingmar Peitz, Gerhard Kelter, Margaret A Phillips, Jonathan L Vennerstrom, Yongyuth Yuthavong, Timothy N C Wells

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 39 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
39citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

39 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. One-Pot Multicomponent Synthesis of Methoxybenzo[Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Ferrous Iron-Dependent Pharmacology.Trends in pharmacological sciences · 2021
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Primaquine derivatives: Modifications of the terminal amino group.European journal of medicinal chemistry · 2019
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rob Hooft van HuijsduijnenMedicines for Malaria Venture (MMV), Geneva, Switzerland.
R Kiplin GuySt. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United States of America.
Kelly ChibaleDepartment of Chemistry and Institute of Infectious Disease and Molecular Medicine, University of Cape Town, Rondebosch, South Africa.
Richard K HaynesCentre of Excellence for Pharmaceutical Sciences, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.
Ingmar PeitzOncotest GmbH, Freiburg, Germany.
Gerhard KelterOncotest GmbH, Freiburg, Germany.
Margaret A PhillipsDepartment of Pharmacology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas, United States of America.
Jonathan L VennerstromDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, Nebraska, United States of America.
Yongyuth YuthavongBIOTEC, National Science and Technology Development Agency, Thailand Science Park, Pathumthani, Thailand.
Timothy N C WellsMedicines for Malaria Venture (MMV), Geneva, Switzerland.

Funding

Optimizing Novel Dihydroorotate Dehydrogenase Inhibitors for Treating MalariaU01AI075594 · NIAID · MEDICINES FOR MALARIA VENTURE · PI WATERSON, DAVID · 2007 to 2011
$5.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI075594
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We have tested five distinct classes of established and experimental antimalarial drugs for their anticancer potential, using a panel of 91 human cancer lines. Three classes of drugs: artemisinins, synthetic peroxides and DHFR (dihydrofolate reductase) inhibitors effected potent inhibition of proliferation with IC50s in the nM- low µM range, whereas a DHODH (dihydroorotate dehydrogenase) and a putative kinase inhibitor displayed no activity. Furthermore, significant synergies were identified with erlotinib, imatinib, cisplatin, dasatinib and vincristine. Cluster analysis of the antimalarials based on their differential inhibition of the various cancer lines clearly segregated the synthetic peroxides OZ277 and OZ439 from the artemisinin cluster that included artesunate, dihydroartemisinin and artemisone, and from the DHFR inhibitors pyrimethamine and P218 (a parasite DHFR inhibitor), emphasizing their shared mode of action. In order to further understand the basis of the selectivity of these compounds against different cancers, microarray-based gene expression data for 85 of the used cell lines were generated. For each compound, distinct sets of genes were identified whose expression significantly correlated with compound sensitivity. Several of the antimalarials tested in this study have well-established and excellent safety profiles with a plasma exposure, when conservatively used in malaria, that is well above the IC50s that we identified in this study. Given their unique mode of action and potential for unique synergies with established anticancer drugs, our results provide a strong basis to further explore the potential application of these compounds in cancer in pre-clinical or and clinical settings.

Indexed as

AntimalarialsAntineoplastic AgentsArtemisininsCell Line, TumorCell ProliferationCluster AnalysisDrug Screening Assays, AntitumorDrug SynergismFolic Acid AntagonistsGene ExpressionHumansPeroxidesAntimalarialsAntineoplastic AgentsArtemisininsFolic Acid AntagonistsPeroxides

Identifiers

PMID24391728
PMCPMC3877007

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.