Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24391555›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in systems neuroscience2013

Closing the loop of deep brain stimulation.

Romain Carron, Antoine Chaillet, Anton Filipchuk, William Pasillas-Lépine, Constance Hammond

Registry-linked trialAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in systems neuroscience, 2013. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03079960 (Data-Driven Characterization of Neuronal Markers During Deep Brain Stimulation for Patients With Parkinson's Disease), which is not on this map. Cited by 48 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03079960 naunknown statusnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Data-Driven Characterization of Neuronal Markers During Deep Brain Stimulation for Patients With Parkinson's Disease

TypeinterventionalSponsorProf. Dr. Volker Arnd CoenenRan2017 to 2021Enrolled120ConditionsParkinson DiseaseArmsElectrophysiological recording and measurement devices
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Romain CarronAix Marseille Université UMR 901 Marseille, France ; Institut national de la Recherche Médicale et de la Santé Inserm, INMED UMR 901 Marseille, France ; APHM, Hopital de la Timone, Service de Neurochirurgie Fonctionnelle et Stereotaxique Marseille, France.
Antoine ChailletLaboratoire des Signaux et Systèmes(L2S), CNRS UMR 8506 Gif-sur-Yvette, France ; Université Paris Sud 11, UMR 8506, Supélec Gif-sur-Yvette, France.
Anton FilipchukAix Marseille Université UMR 901 Marseille, France ; Institut national de la Recherche Médicale et de la Santé Inserm, INMED UMR 901 Marseille, France.
William Pasillas-LépineLaboratoire des Signaux et Systèmes(L2S), CNRS UMR 8506 Gif-sur-Yvette, France ; Centre national de la recherche scientifique Paris, France.
Constance HammondAix Marseille Université UMR 901 Marseille, France ; Institut national de la Recherche Médicale et de la Santé Inserm, INMED UMR 901 Marseille, France.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

High-frequency deep brain stimulation is used to treat a wide range of brain disorders, like Parkinson's disease. The stimulated networks usually share common electrophysiological signatures, including hyperactivity and/or dysrhythmia. From a clinical perspective, HFS is expected to alleviate clinical signs without generating adverse effects. Here, we consider whether the classical open-loop HFS fulfills these criteria and outline current experimental or theoretical research on the different types of closed-loop DBS that could provide better clinical outcomes. In the first part of the review, the two routes followed by HFS-evoked axonal spikes are explored. In one direction, orthodromic spikes functionally de-afferent the stimulated nucleus from its downstream target networks. In the opposite direction, antidromic spikes prevent this nucleus from being influenced by its afferent networks. As a result, the pathological synchronized activity no longer propagates from the cortical networks to the stimulated nucleus. The overall result can be described as a reversible functional de-afferentation of the stimulated nucleus from its upstream and downstream nuclei. In the second part of the review, the latest advances in closed-loop DBS are considered. Some of the proposed approaches are based on mathematical models, which emphasize different aspects of the parkinsonian basal ganglia: excessive synchronization, abnormal firing-rate rhythms, and a deficient thalamo-cortical relay. The stimulation strategies are classified depending on the control-theory techniques on which they are based: adaptive and on-demand stimulation schemes, delayed and multi-site approaches, stimulations based on proportional and/or derivative control actions, optimal control strategies. Some of these strategies have been validated experimentally, but there is still a large reservoir of theoretical work that may point to ways of improving practical treatment.

Indexed as

antidromicclosed loopDBSmechanismsopen loop

Identifiers

PMID24391555
PMCPMC3868949

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.