Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24391522›Full record

ArticlePLoS genetics2014

Subtle changes in motif positioning cause tissue-specific effects on robustness of an enhancer's activity.

Jelena Erceg, Timothy E Saunders, Charles Girardot, Damien P Devos, Lars Hufnagel, Eileen E M Furlong

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS genetics, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed
4.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 72 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Rewriting regulatory DNA to dissect and reprogram gene expression.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Protein expression/secretion boost by a novel unique 21-mer cis-regulatory motif (Exin21) via mRNA stabilization.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Functional genomic approaches to elucidate the role of enhancers during development.Wiley interdisciplinary reviews. Systems biology and medicine · 2020
    Review
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Jelena ErcegGenome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Timothy E SaundersGenome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany ; Cell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Charles GirardotGenome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Damien P DevosGenome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Lars HufnagelCell Biology and Biophysics Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
Eileen E M FurlongGenome Biology Unit, European Molecular Biology Laboratory (EMBL), Heidelberg, Germany.
European Molecular Biology Laboratory · DEEuropean Molecular Biology Laboratory · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deciphering the specific contribution of individual motifs within cis-regulatory modules (CRMs) is crucial to understanding how gene expression is regulated and how this process is affected by sequence variation. But despite vast improvements in the ability to identify where transcription factors (TFs) bind throughout the genome, we are limited in our ability to relate information on motif occupancy to function from sequence alone. Here, we engineered 63 synthetic CRMs to systematically assess the relationship between variation in the content and spacing of motifs within CRMs to CRM activity during development using Drosophila transgenic embryos. In over half the cases, very simple elements containing only one or two types of TF binding motifs were capable of driving specific spatio-temporal patterns during development. Different motif organizations provide different degrees of robustness to enhancer activity, ranging from binary on-off responses to more subtle effects including embryo-to-embryo and within-embryo variation. By quantifying the effects of subtle changes in motif organization, we were able to model biophysical rules that explain CRM behavior and may contribute to the spatial positioning of CRM activity in vivo. For the same enhancer, the effects of small differences in motif positions varied in developmentally related tissues, suggesting that gene expression may be more susceptible to sequence variation in one tissue compared to another. This result has important implications for human eQTL studies in which many associated mutations are found in cis-regulatory regions, though the mechanism for how they affect tissue-specific gene expression is often not understood.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnimals, Genetically ModifiedDNA-Binding ProteinsDrosophila melanogasterEnhancer Elements, GeneticGene Expression Regulation, DevelopmentalGenomeHumansMutationNucleotide MotifsQuantitative Trait LociRegulatory Sequences, Nucleic AcidSequence Analysis, DNATranscription FactorsDNA-Binding ProteinsTranscription Factors

Identifiers

PMID24391522
PMCPMC3879207
OpenAlexW2029436624

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.