Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24391202›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014

Rapid ertapenem susceptibility testing and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase phenotype detection in Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates by use of automated microscopy of immobilized live bacterial cells.

Carey-Ann D Burnham, Rachel A Frobel, Monica L Herrera, Brian L Wickes

Abstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Ventilator-Associated Pneumonia: The Role of Emerging Diagnostic Technologies.Seminars in respiratory and critical care medicine · 2017
    Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. If antibiotics did not exist.Intensive care medicine · 2015
    Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Carey-Ann D BurnhamDepartment of Pathology and Immunology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, Missouri, USA.
Rachel A Frobel
Monica L Herrera
Brian L Wickes

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We evaluated detection of ertapenem (ETP) resistance and Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) in 47 Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates using a novel automated microscopy system. Automated microscopy correctly classified 22/23 isolates as ETP resistant and 24/24 as ETP susceptible and correctly classified 21/21 isolates as KPC positive and 26/26 as KPC negative.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAutomation, LaboratoryBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamasesbeta-LactamsErtapenemHumansKlebsiella InfectionsKlebsiella pneumoniaeMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMicroscopyPhenotypeAnti-Bacterial AgentsBacterial Proteinsbeta-Lactamasesbeta-LactamscarbapenemaseErtapenem

Identifiers

PMID24391202
PMCPMC3957783

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.