Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24391201›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014

Molecular epidemiology of enterococcal bacteremia in Australia.

Geoffrey W Coombs, Julie C Pearson, Denise A Daley, Tam Le, Owen J Robinson, Thomas Gottlieb, Benjamin P Howden, Paul D R Johnson, Catherine M Bennett, Timothy P Stinear and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. FEMS microbes · 2023
    Article
  3. Effects ofAquaculture nutrition · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Probiotic potential and safety assessment of bacteriocinogenicCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2021
    Article
  6. Clinical and molecular epidemiology of vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus faecium bacteremia from an Indian tertiary hospital.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2021
    Article
  7. Linezolid Resistance inFrontiers in public health · 2021
    Article
  8. Daptomycin Resistance Occurs Predominantly inFrontiers in microbiology · 2021
    Article
  9. Antimicrobial Resistance in ESKAPE Pathogens.Clinical microbiology reviews · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Quality of molecular detection of vancomycin resistance in enterococci: results of 6 consecutive years of Quality Control for Molecular Diagnostics (QCMD) external quality assessment.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  13. Clinical characteristics and treatment outcomes of Enterococcus durans bacteremia: a 20-year experience in a tertiary care hospital.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2019
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Vancomycin-resistantAntimicrobial resistance and infection control · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Geoffrey W CoombsAustralian Collaborating Centre for Enterococcus and Staphylococcus Species (ACCESS) Typing and Research, School of Biomedical Sciences, Curtin University, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.
Julie C Pearson
Denise A Daley
Tam Le
Owen J Robinson
Thomas Gottlieb
Benjamin P Howden
Paul D R Johnson
Catherine M Bennett
Timothy P Stinear
John D Turnidge
Australian Group on Antimicrobial Resistance

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Enterococci are a major cause of health care-associated infections and account for approximately 10% of all bacteremias globally. The aim of this study was to determine the proportion of enterococcal bacteremia isolates in Australia that are antimicrobial resistant, with particular emphasis on susceptibility to ampicillin and the glycopeptides, and to characterize the molecular epidemiology of the Enterococcus faecalis and Enterococcus faecium isolates. From 1 January to 31 December 2011, 1,079 unique episodes of bacteremia were investigated, of which 95.8% were caused by either E. faecalis (61.0%) or E. faecium (34.8%). The majority of bacteremias were health care associated, and approximately one-third were polymicrobial. Ampicillin resistance was detected in 90.4% of E. faecium isolates but was not detected in E. faecalis isolates. Vancomycin nonsusceptibility was reported in 0.6% and 36.5% of E. faecalis and E. faecium isolates, respectively. Unlike Europe and the United States, where vancomycin resistance in E. faecium is predominately due to the acquisition of the vanA operon, 98.4% of E. faecium isolates harboring van genes carried the vanB operon, and 16.1% of the vanB E. faecium isolates had vancomycin MICs at or below the susceptible breakpoint of the CLSI. Although molecular typing identified 126 E. faecalis pulsed-field gel electrophoresis pulsotypes, >50% belonged to two pulsotypes that were isolated across Australia. E. faecium consisted of 73 pulsotypes from which 43 multilocus sequence types were identified. Almost 90% of the E. faecium isolates were identified as CC17 clones, of which approximately half were characterized as ST203, which was isolated Australia-wide. In conclusion, the Australian Enterococcal Sepsis Outcome Programme (AESOP) study has shown that although they are polyclonal, enterococcal bacteremias in Australia are frequently caused by ampicillin-resistant vanB E. faecium.

Indexed as

Anti-Bacterial AgentsAustraliaBacteremiaCoinfectionCross InfectionDrug Resistance, BacterialEnterococcus faecalisEnterococcus faeciumGenes, BacterialGram-Positive Bacterial InfectionsHumansMicrobial Sensitivity TestsMolecular EpidemiologyMolecular TypingAnti-Bacterial Agents

Identifiers

PMID24391201
PMCPMC3957796

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.