Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24391200›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2014

Detection of Trichomonas vaginalis DNA by use of self-obtained vaginal swabs with the BD ProbeTec Qx assay on the BD Viper system.

Barbara Van Der Pol, James A Williams, Stephanie N Taylor, Catherine L Cammarata, Charles A Rivers, Barbara A Body, Melinda Nye, Deanna Fuller, Jane R Schwebke, Mathilda Barnes and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · bronzeAbstract readComparative StudyEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT02641717 (Validity of Patient-Collected Wet Mounts), which is not on this map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT02641717 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2015, after this paper: background citation

Validity of Patient-Collected Wet Mounts

TypeinterventionalSponsorThe University of Texas Health Science Center at San AntonioRan2015 to 2016Enrolled77ConditionsVaginal Discharge, Trichomonas, Candidiasis, Vaginosis, BacterialArmsvaginal swab
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 61 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Sexually Transmitted Infections Treatment Guidelines, 2021.MMWR. Recommendations and reports : Morbidity and mortality weekly report. Recommendations and reports · 2021
    Guideline
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Molecular Diagnosis ofJournal of tropical medicine · 2026
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Trichomoniasis.Infectious disease clinics of North America · 2023
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Trichomonas vaginalis Virus Among Women With Trichomoniasis and Associations With Demographics, Clinical Outcomes, and Metronidazole Resistance.Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2019
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Why Does Trichomonas vaginalis Continue to be a "Neglected" Sexually Transmitted Infection?Clinical infectious diseases : an official publication of the Infectious Diseases Society of America · 2018
    Article
  16. Cross-sectional study to evaluateSexually transmitted infections · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.

Barbara Van Der PolDivision of Infectious Diseases, University of Alabama at Birmingham School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama, USA.
James A Williams
Stephanie N Taylor
Catherine L Cammarata
Charles A Rivers
Barbara A Body
Melinda Nye
Deanna Fuller
Jane R Schwebke
Mathilda Barnes
Charlotte A Gaydos
Johns Hopkins University · USLabCorp (United States) · USLouisiana State University Health Sciences Center New Orleans · USUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham · USIndiana University – Purdue University Indianapolis · USIndiana University School of MedicineSidney & Lois Eskenazi Hospital · US

Funding

LC: HIV Prevention Trials Network - Laboratory Support for the SARS-CoV-2 Seroprevalence Study (CoVPN 5002)UM1AI068613 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI SUSAN H ESHLEMAN, Mark A Marzinke · 2011 to 2026
$100.2M
TrainingU54EB007958 · NIBIB · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI Susan Anne Tuddenham · 2007 to 2026
$34.6M
HIV Prevention Trials Network: Network LaboratoryU01AI068613 · NIAID · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI ESHLEMAN, SUSAN H · 2006 to 2010
$16.5M
NIAID NIH HHS U01 AI068613NIAID NIH HHS UM1 AI068613NIBIB NIH HHS U54 EB007958
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trichomonas vaginalis is the most prevalent nonviral sexually transmitted infection worldwide, and improved diagnostic methods are critical for controlling this pathogen. Diagnostic assays that can be used in conjunction with routine chlamydia/gonorrhea nucleic acid-based screening are likely to have the most impact on disease control. Here we describe the performance of the new BD T. vaginalis Qx (TVQ) amplified DNA assay, which can be performed on the automated BD Viper system. We focus on data from vaginal swab samples, since this is the specimen type routinely used for traditional trichomonas testing and the recommended specimen type for chlamydia/gonorrhea screening. Vaginal swabs were obtained from women attending sexually transmitted disease or family planning clinics at 7 sites. Patient-collected vaginal swabs were tested by the TVQ assay, and the Aptima T. vaginalis (ATV) assay was performed using clinician-collected vaginal swabs. Additional clinician-collected vaginal swabs were used for the wet mount and culture methods. Analyses included comparisons versus the patient infection status (PIS) defined by positive results with the wet mount method or culture, direct comparisons assessed with κ scores, and latent class analysis (LCA) as an unbiased estimator of test accuracy. Data from 838 women, 116 of whom were infected with T. vaginalis, were analyzed. The TVQ assay sensitivity and specificity estimates based on the PIS were 98.3% and 99.0%, respectively. The TVQ assay was similar to the ATV assay (κ=0.938) in direct analysis. LCA estimated the TVQ sensitivity and specificity as 98.3 and 99.6%, respectively. The TVQ assay performed well using self-collected vaginal swabs, the optimal sample type, as recommended by the CDC for chlamydia/gonorrhea screening among women.

Indexed as

AdultAutomation, LaboratoryDNA, ProtozoanFemaleHumansMolecular Diagnostic TechniquesParasitologySelf AdministrationSensitivity and SpecificitySpecimen HandlingTrichomonas vaginalisTrichomonas VaginitisVaginaDNA, Protozoan

Identifiers

PMID24391200
PMCPMC3957762
OpenAlexW2080890886

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.