Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24391150›Full record

ArticleGenome biology and evolution2014

Novel papillomaviruses in free-ranging Iberian bats: no virus-host co-evolution, no strict host specificity, and hints for recombination.

Raquel García-Pérez, Carlos Ibáñez, Jose M Godínez, Nidia Aréchiga, Inazio Garin, Gonzalo Pérez-Suárez, Oscar de Paz, Javier Juste, Juan E Echevarría, Ignacio G Bravo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Genome biology and evolution, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 70 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Characterization of Three Novel Papillomavirus Genomes in Vampire Bats (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. First Report ofViruses · 2021
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Origin and evolution of papillomavirus (onco)genes and genomes.Philosophical transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological sciences · 2019
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Raquel García-PérezInfections and Cancer Laboratory, Catalan Institute of Oncology (ICO), Barcelona, Spain.
Carlos Ibáñez
Jose M Godínez
Nidia Aréchiga
Inazio Garin
Gonzalo Pérez-Suárez
Oscar de Paz
Javier Juste
Juan E Echevarría
Ignacio G Bravo
Centro Nacional de Sanidad Ambiental · ESEstación Biológica de Doñana · ESInstitut Català d'Oncologia · ESUniversidad de Alcalá · ESInstitut Català d'Ornitologia · ESUniversity of the Basque Country · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Papillomaviruses (PVs) are widespread pathogens. However, the extent of PV infections in bats remains largely unknown. This work represents the first comprehensive study of PVs in Iberian bats. We identified four novel PVs in the mucosa of free-ranging Eptesicus serotinus (EserPV1, EserPV2, and EserPV3) and Rhinolophus ferrumequinum (RferPV1) individuals and analyzed their phylogenetic relationships within the viral family. We further assessed their prevalence in different populations of E. serotinus and its close relative E. isabellinus. Although it is frequent to read that PVs co-evolve with their host, that PVs are highly species-specific, and that PVs do not usually recombine, our results suggest otherwise. First, strict virus-host co-evolution is rejected by the existence of five, distantly related bat PV lineages and by the lack of congruence between bats and bat PVs phylogenies. Second, the ability of EserPV2 and EserPV3 to infect two different bat species (E. serotinus and E. isabellinus) argues against strict host specificity. Finally, the description of a second noncoding region in the RferPV1 genome reinforces the view of an increased susceptibility to recombination in the E2-L2 genomic region. These findings prompt the question of whether the prevailing paradigms regarding PVs evolution should be reconsidered.

Indexed as

Evolution, MolecularGenome, ViralHost SpecificityRecombination, GeneticAnimalsBase SequenceChiropteraMolecular Sequence DataPapillomaviridaePhylogenybatsbiodiversityevolutionpapillomavirusphylogenywildlife

Identifiers

PMID24391150
PMCPMC3914694
OpenAlexW1978475975

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.