ArticleJournal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea)2014
Proteomic comparison between Salmonella Typhimurium and Salmonella Typhi.
Article in Journal of microbiology (Seoul, Korea), 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Article
- New Insights on the Early Interaction Between Typhoid and Non-typhoidFrontiers in microbiology · 2021Review
- Proteomic Applications in Antimicrobial Resistance and Clinical Microbiology Studies.Infection and drug resistance · 2020Review
- Salmonella Typhi, Paratyphi A, Enteritidis and Typhimurium core proteomes reveal differentially expressed proteins linked to the cell surface and pathogenicity.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019Article
- Proteomics As a Tool for Studying Bacterial Virulence and Antimicrobial Resistance.Frontiers in microbiology · 2016Review
- Complete proteome of a quinolone-resistant Salmonella Typhimurium phage type DT104B clinical strain.International journal of molecular sciences · 2014Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The genus Salmonella contains more than 2500 serovars. While most cause the self-limiting gastroenteritis, a few serovars can elicit typhoid fever, a severe systemic infection. S. enterica subsp. enterica serovar Typhimurium and S. Typhi are the representatives of the gastroenteritis and typhoid fever types of Salmonella. In this study, we adopted Stable Isotope Labeling with Amino acids in Cell culture (SILAC) technology to quantitatively compare the proteomes of the two serovars. We found several proteins with serovar-specific expression, which could be developed as new biomarkers for clinical serotype diagnosis. We found that flagella and chemotaxis genes were down-regulated in S. Typhi in comparison with S. Typhimurium. We attributed this observation to the fact that the smooth cellular structure of S. Typhi may better fit its systemic lifestyle. Instead of known virulence factors that were located within Salmonella Pathogenecity Islands, a number of core genes, which were involved in metabolism and transport of carbohydrates and amino acids, showed differential expression between the two serovars. Further studies on the roles of these differentially-expressed genes in the pathogenesis should be undertaken.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.