Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24390757›Full record

ReviewCurrent rheumatology reports2014

Pregnancy morbidity in antiphospholipid syndrome: what is the impact of treatment?

Guilherme R de Jesús, Gustavo Rodrigues, Nilson R de Jesús, Roger A Levy

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Current rheumatology reports, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Placental contribution to neonatal encephalopathy.Seminars in fetal & neonatal medicine · 2021
    Review
  8. Article
  9. Changes of lipoxin levels during pregnancy and the monthly-cycle, condition the normal course of pregnancy or pathology.Inflammation research : official journal of the European Histamine Research Society ... [et al.] · 2020
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Guilherme R de JesúsDepartment of Obstetrics, Faculdade de Ciências Médicas, Universidade do Estado do Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, guilhermedejesus@gmail.com.
Gustavo Rodrigues
Nilson R de Jesús
Roger A Levy

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Women with persistently circulating antiphospholipid antibodies (aPL) have a higher incidence of recurrent abortions, fetal losses, pre-eclampsia, and placental insufficiency. Current treatment of patients with antiphospholipid syndrome (APS) during pregnancy with heparin and aspirin can act by preventing clot formation and improving live birth rates, but other obstetric morbidities remain high, especially in patients with a history of thrombotic events. In addition to the classical thrombotic placental events, other factors involving inflammation and complement activation seem to play a role in certain complications. In this article, we will review how medications interfere in the pathogenic mechanisms of APS, discuss the impact of current recommended treatment on pregnancy morbidity, and analyze new promising therapies.

Indexed as

Abortion, HabitualAnticoagulantsAntiphospholipid SyndromeAspirinFemaleFetal Growth RetardationHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHumansHydroxychloroquinePre-EclampsiaPregnancyPregnancy ComplicationsPregnancy OutcomeTreatment OutcomeAnticoagulantsAspirinHeparin, Low-Molecular-WeightHydroxychloroquine

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.