Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24390682›Full record

Trial reportDer Anaesthesist2014

["Jump in at the deep end" : simulator-based learning in acute care].

G Breuer, K Schweizer, J Schüttler, M Weiß, A Vladut

Abstract readEnglish AbstractRandomized Controlled Trial
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Trial report in Der Anaesthesist, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

G BreuerKlinik für Anästhesiologie, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Krankenhausstr. 12, 91054, Erlangen, Deutschland, georg.breuer@kfa.imed.uni-erlangen.de.
K Schweizer
J Schüttler
M Weiß
A Vladut
Universitätsklinikum Erlangen · DEFriedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversity of Education Weingarten · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWith high-fidelity simulators in a modern blended learning setting, students are able to acquire knowledge and practical skills in acute medicine in realistic scenarios. However, it has not yet been clarified if the sequence of linking between knowledge and simulator-based training of practical skills plays an important role for increasing knowledge, for the self-concept and learning emotions of trainees.

aimIn a pilot study the influence of the type of knowledge acquisition under two independent conditions was investigated in which the order of presenting the learning material (firstly theory and then simulation vs. simulation elements before the theory) was reversed. In addition the influence of individual attributes of personality on the construction of situated knowledge was correlated with these conditions in two groups. MATERIAL AND

methodsTo investigate the outcome of simulator-based learning 20 students were randomly allocated to one of the two conditions and undertook two scenarios (anaphylactic shock and myocardial infarction), whereby the theoretical lessons were given either before or after the scenarios. Using standardized questionnaires and problem-centered semi-standardized interviews, the following variables of the participants were assessed: personality traits, current positive and negative feelings, professional self-concept, general self-efficacy and coping strategies for stress. Theoretical knowledge and practical skills were assessed using a knowledge test and standardized assessment questionnaires which also focused on performance and patient safety.

resultsAll together the results showed a slight advantage for the condition of theory before simulation which was not determined by the acquisition of knowledge but by a better performance of trainees as assessed by the trainers. Regarding knowledge acquisition, no statistically significant differences could be shown. Significant differences (p < 0.05) were found for negative feelings (very intense negative emotional state) and for the professional self-concept (perception of own professional skills) in favor of the theory then simulation condition. More extrovert participants showed poorer results which could not be attributed to one of the conditions. However, the participants always assessed the allocated learning condition as the best premise for effective learning outcome. Reaction to stress has been described as "jumping in at the deep end" as well as the lasting effect on learning from errors.

conclusionIn the context of simulation-based teaching, the learning outcome not only depends on knowledge, practical skills and motivational variables but also on the presence of negative feelings, ability self-concepts and various personality traits. There was a trend which showed that simulation in the field of anesthesiology and emergency medicine should be set up with the theoretical basis first in order to avoid negative feelings.

Indexed as

Clinical CompetencePatient SimulationAdultAnesthesiologyEmergency MedicineEmotionsFemaleHumansLearningMalePilot ProjectsSelf ConceptYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID24390682
OpenAlexW201410458

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.