ReviewProtoplasma2014
Molecular diffusion and binding analyzed with FRAP.
Review in Protoplasma, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
18 citing papers in PubMed.
- Synthesis and Characterization of a Novel Photocleavable Fluorescent Dye Dyad for Diffusion Imaging.Chemical & biomedical imaging · 2025Article
- Single-molecule imaging for investigating the transcriptional control.Molecules and cells · 2025Review
- Article
- Detection of Stress-Induced Changes in Subcellular Protein Distribution.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2024Article
- What's past is prologue: FRAP keeps delivering 50 years later.Biophysical journal · 2023Review
- Specialized cells that sense tissue mechanics to regulate Drosophila morphogenesis.Developmental cell · 2023Article
- Article
- FLIP-based autophagy-detecting technique reveals closed autophagic compartments.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- CAMSAP2 organizes a γ-tubulin-independent microtubule nucleation centre through phase separation.eLife · 2022Article
- Review
- Xist spatially amplifies SHARP/SPEN recruitment to balance chromosome-wide silencing and specificity to the X chromosome.Nature structural & molecular biology · 2022Article
- Article
- Fast Diffusion of the Unassembled PetC1-GFP Protein in the Cyanobacterial Thylakoid Membrane.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2020Article
- A Method for High-Throughput Measurements of Viscosity in Sub-micrometer-Sized Membrane Systems.Chembiochem : a European journal of chemical biology · 2020Article
- Intranuclear Mobility of Estrogen Receptor: Implication for Transcriptional Regulation.Acta histochemica et cytochemica · 2018Article
- Dynamic microtubule association of Doublecortin X (DCX) is regulated by its C-terminus.Scientific reports · 2017Article
- PhotoGate microscopy to track single molecules in crowded environments.Nature communications · 2017Article
- Dynamic properties of independent chromatin domains measured by correlation spectroscopy in living cells.Epigenetics & chromatin · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Intracellular molecular transport and localization are crucial for cells (plant cells as much as mammalian cells) to proliferate and to adapt to diverse environmental conditions. Here, some aspects of the microscopy-based method of fluorescence recovery after photobleaching (FRAP) are introduced. In the course of the last years, this has become a very powerful tool to study dynamic processes in living cells and tissue, and it is expected to experience further increasing demand because quantitative information on biological systems becomes more and more important. This review introduces the FRAP methodology, including some theoretical background, describes challenges and pitfalls, and presents some recent advanced applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
24390250What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.