Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24390225›Full record

ArticleNature neuroscience2014

Flies and humans share a motion estimation strategy that exploits natural scene statistics.

Damon A Clark, James E Fitzgerald, Justin M Ales, Daryl M Gohl, Marion A Silies, Anthony M Norcia, Thomas R Clandinin

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature neuroscience, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 67 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
67citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

67 citing papers in PubMed, 105 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Fly navigational responses exploit plume-specific odor motion and gradient cues.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Afterimages drive a shared visual motion-reversal illusion inbioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Broken time-reversal symmetry in visual motion detection.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Optimization in Visual Motion Estimation.Annual review of vision science · 2024
    Review
  15. Broken time reversal symmetry in visual motion detection.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

7 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Damon A Clark1] Department of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. [2] [3].ORCID 000000018487700X
James E Fitzgerald1] Department of Physics, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. [2] [3].ORCID 0000000209494188
Justin M Ales1] Department of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA. [2] [3].
Daryl M GohlDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Marion A SiliesDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Anthony M NorciaDepartment of Psychology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Thomas R ClandininDepartment of Neurobiology, Stanford University, Stanford, California, USA.
Stanford University · US

Funding

Dissecting the functional anatomy of the visual system: a new way forwardDP1OD003530 · OD · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CLANDININ, THOMAS ROBERT · 2007 to 2011
$3.9M
Form and Motion IntegrationR01EY015790 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI NORCIA, ANTHONY M · 2004 to 2014
$3.7M
Dissecting Neural Circuit Computations in the Peripheral Visual SystemR01EY022638 · NEI · STANFORD UNIVERSITY · PI CLANDININ, THOMAS ROBERT · 2012 to 2021
$3.5M
Form and Motion IntegrationR56EY015790 · NEI · SMITH-KETTLEWELL EYE RESEARCH INSTITUTE · PI NORCIA, ANTHONY M · 2008 to 2008
$443k
NEI NIH HHS EY015790NEI NIH HHS R01 EY015790NEI NIH HHS R01 EY022638NEI NIH HHS R56 EY015790NIH HHS DP1 OD003530
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sighted animals extract motion information from visual scenes by processing spatiotemporal patterns of light falling on the retina. The dominant models for motion estimation exploit intensity correlations only between pairs of points in space and time. Moving natural scenes, however, contain more complex correlations. We found that fly and human visual systems encode the combined direction and contrast polarity of moving edges using triple correlations that enhance motion estimation in natural environments. Both species extracted triple correlations with neural substrates tuned for light or dark edges, and sensitivity to specific triple correlations was retained even as light and dark edge motion signals were combined. Thus, both species separately process light and dark image contrasts to capture motion signatures that can improve estimation accuracy. This convergence argues that statistical structures in natural scenes have greatly affected visual processing, driving a common computational strategy over 500 million years of evolution.

Indexed as

Models, NeurologicalAdaptation, PhysiologicalAnimalsContrast SensitivityDrosophilaElectroencephalographyEvoked Potentials, VisualGenotypeHumansMotion PerceptionPattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationPsychophysics

Identifiers

PMID24390225
PMCPMC3993001
OpenAlexW1984478493

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.