Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24389825›Full record

SynthesisSupportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer2014

Breast cancer and coping among women of color: a systematic review of the literature.

Grace J Yoo, Ellen G Levine, Rena Pasick

Open access · greenAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 25 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
25citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

25 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 53 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Calidad de Vida: a systematic review of quality of life in Latino cancer survivors in the USA.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2020
    Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Observational
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Keeping us all whole: Acknowledging the agency of African American breast cancer survivors and their systems of social support.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Article
  13. An overview of the unique challenges facing African-American breast cancer survivors.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2019
    Review
  14. Article
  15. Exploring Positive Survivorship Experiences of Indigenous Australian Cancer Patients.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2018
    Article
  16. Exploring Coping Strategies Among Young Asian American Women Breast Cancer Survivors.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2017
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Cancer Support Needs for African American Breast Cancer Survivors and Caregivers.Journal of cancer education : the official journal of the American Association for Cancer Education · 2016
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Grace J YooAsian American Studies Department, Cancer Disparities Research Group, San Francisco State University, 1600 Holloway, EP 103, San Francisco, CA, 94132, USA, gracey@sfsu.edu.
Ellen G Levine
Rena Pasick
San Francisco State University · USUniversity of California, San Francisco · US

Funding

Student EnrichmentP20MD000544 · NIMHD · SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI BAIRD, TEASTER T · 2003 to 2012
$9.4M
SFSU/UCSF Comprehensive cancer Partnership ProgramU56CA096217 · NCI · SAN FRANCISCO STATE UNIVERSITY · PI MACHER, BRUCE A. · 2002 to 2008
$2.5M
NCI NIH HHS U56 CA096217NIMHD NIH HHS P20 MD000544NIMHD NIH HHS P20MD000544
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Breast cancer is the most commonly diagnosed form of cancer for women regardless of race/ethnicity. Women of color are diagnosed at later stages and experience greater mortality than their White counterparts. However, there has been comparatively little research on coping with breast among racial/ethnic minorities at time of diagnosis, during treatment, or in the course of survivorship. This is despite the fact that research has repeatedly shown that distress can impact disease progression and survival. The questions asked of this systematic literature review include: (1) What is known about coping with breast cancer among major racial/ethnic groups? (2) What are the strengths and gaps in research to date? Over 120 peer-reviewed published studies (1980-2012) were reviewed. A total of 33 met criteria for inclusion including 15 quantitative, 17 qualitative, and 1 mixed methods study. The majority of studies were small sample cross-sectional studies. Only five studies were longitudinal, and two randomized-controlled intervention trials sought to improve coping among survivors. The most common topic in both quantitative and qualitative studies was spirituality and coping among African American breast cancer patients. Thirteen studies included Latinas only or in combination with other groups. Only one quantitative and one qualitative study solely addressed the Asian American population exploring coping and adjustment. In the course of this systematic literature review, we elucidate what is known about coping with breast cancer among racial/ethnic minority women and identify priorities for future research.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalBlack or African AmericanBreast NeoplasmsAdultFemaleHumans

Identifiers

PMID24389825
PMCPMC4537653
OpenAlexW2043343478

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.