Evidence map›Paper›PMID 24389535›Full record

ReviewMutation research2014

The strategies to control prostate cancer by chemoprevention approaches.

Harold Ting, Gagan Deep, Chapla Agarwal, Rajesh Agarwal

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Mutation research, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
5.4field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 43 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Root Extract of a MicropropagatedEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2022
    Article
  3. Leelamine suppresses cMyc expression in prostate cancer cellsJournal of cancer metastasis and treatment · 2021
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. A Review of the Potential of Phytochemicals fromEvidence-based complementary and alternative medicine : eCAM · 2017
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Harold TingDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.
Gagan DeepDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States; University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.
Chapla AgarwalDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States; University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States.
Rajesh AgarwalDepartment of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Skaggs School of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Sciences, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States; University of Colorado Cancer Center, University of Colorado, Aurora, CO, United States. Electronic address: Rajesh.Agarwal@UCDenver.edu.
University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus · USUniversity of Montana · US

Funding

Prostate cancer prevention and treatment by sillibininR01CA102514 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI AGARWAL, RAJESH · 2003 to 2013
$3.6M
Prostate Cancer Prevention by Procyanidins in Grape Seed ExtractR01CA091883 · NCI · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO DENVER · PI AGARWAL, CHAPLA · 2003 to 2012
$3.3M
NCI NIH HHS CA102514NCI NIH HHS CA91883NCI NIH HHS R01 CA091883NCI NIH HHS R01 CA102514
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Prostate cancer (PCA) is the most commonly diagnosed cancer in men in the United States with growing worldwide incidence. Despite intensive investment in improving early detection, PCA often escapes timely detection and mortality remains high; this malignancy being the second highest cancer-associated mortality in American men. Collectively, health care costs of PCA results in an immense financial burden that is only expected to grow. Additionally, even in cases of successful treatment, PCA is associated with long-term and pervasive effects on patients. A proactive alternative to treat PCA is to prevent its occurrence and progression prior to symptomatic malignancy. This may serve to address the issue of burgeoning healthcare costs and increasing number of sufferers. One potential regimen in service of this alternative is PCA chemoprevention. Here, chemical compounds with cancer preventive efficacy are identified on the basis of their potential in a host of categories: their historical medicinal use, correlation with reduced risk in population studies, non-toxicity, their unique chemical properties, or their role in biological systems. PCA chemopreventive agents are drawn from multiple broad classes of chemicals, themselves further subdivided based on source or potential effect, with most derived from natural products. Many such compounds have shown efficacy, varying from inhibiting deregulated PCA cell signaling, proliferation, epithelial to mesenchymal transition (EMT), invasion, metastasis, tumor growth and angiogenesis and inducing apoptosis. Overall, these chemopreventive agents show great promise in PCA pre-clinical models, though additional work remains to be done in effectively translating these findings into clinical use.

Indexed as

AnimalsAnticarcinogenic AgentsHumansMaleProstatic NeoplasmsAnticarcinogenic AgentsChemopreventionGrape seed extractNatural productsProstate cancerSilibinin

Identifiers

PMID24389535
PMCPMC3923454
OpenAlexW2002232863

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.