ArticleJournal of the American Academy of Dermatology2014
Clinical utility of a circulating tumor cell assay in Merkel cell carcinoma.
Article in Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.
- An Overview of Circulating Biomarkers in Neuroendocrine Neoplasms: A Clinical Guide.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- The Potential Role of Liquid Biopsies in Advancing the Understanding of Neuroendocrine Neoplasms.Journal of clinical medicine · 2021Review
- Review
- Circulating Tumor Cell Detection and Polyomavirus Status in Merkel Cell Carcinoma.Scientific reports · 2020Article
- The Prognostic Value of Circulating Tumor Cells in Asian Neuroendocrine Tumors.Scientific reports · 2019Article
- Merkel cell polyomavirus and cutaneous Merkel cell carcinoma.Future science OA · 2016Article
- Merkel Cell Carcinoma Therapeutic Update.Current treatment options in oncology · 2016Review
- Evaluating blood levels of neuron specific enolase, chromogranin A, and circulating tumor cells as Merkel cell carcinoma biomarkers.Oncotarget · 2015Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundQuantitation of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) has utility in managing breast, colon, and prostate carcinomas.
objectiveWe sought to determine whether a commercially available CTC assay provides prognostic information in Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC), insight into treatment responses, or both.
methodsWe analyzed CTCs in 52 specimens from 34 patients with MCC.
resultsThe presence of CTCs correlated with extent of disease at blood draw (P = .004). Among 15 patients with regional nodal disease, CTC-negative patients had 80% disease-specific survival at 2 years after the test, versus 29% for CTC-positive patients (P = .015). Among the entire cohort, those without CTCs had 72% MCC-specific survival whereas CTC-positive patients had 25% survival (n = 34, median follow-up 19 months, P = .0003). Fifty seven percent of patients with MCC had a cytokeratin "dot" visible in 20% or more of CTCs, a feature that was absent among CTCs from other carcinomas (0 of 13 cases). LIMITATIONS: CTC assay was performed at variable times after diagnosis and heterogeneity in extent of disease affects interpretability of the data.
conclusionCTC detection in MCC is feasible and appears to add prognostic information, particularly in patients with regional nodal disease. It may also assist clinical management in certain situations, including differentiating metastatic MCC cells from those of other carcinomas.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.